Laserfiche WebLink
�� T� contractor was unable to schedule the remainder of the work to staff's satisfaction. <br /> The Public Works Services Director terminated the contract prior to completion. The <br /> termination letter stated that prior to CC Corp receiving award of any future bids they will <br /> have to clearly demonstrate to the City their ability to perform the work. This teRnination is <br /> grounds for rejecting a future bid. <br /> CC Corp has completed the work they did perForm to City sp�cifications ard staff <br /> recommends accepting the improvements. There is a one-year guar�•ntee on the co,�crete <br /> improv�ments written into the contract agreement. <br /> Alternatives <br /> (1) Do not to accept the project and do not release the retention. Staff believes that all <br /> known requests for punch list items have been corrected. The work should be <br /> accepted. The contractor is due his retention for this project. <br /> (2) Pursue legal action and bonds for the incomplete work (i.e. the 25.4% of the work that <br /> was never started). Staff recommends not pursuing this option at this time. This <br /> action would require time and funds that are not reasonably justified by the amount of <br /> incomplete work. <br /> Fiscal Impact <br /> Adequate funds are available and have been encumbered in the Capital Improvement <br /> Program (CIP), Tree Preservation and Sidewalk Repair project to cover the release of <br /> retention. The balance of funds will be rolled into the 2003-2004 Tree Preservation and <br /> Sidewalk Repair Program, which is currently out to bid. <br /> „ � <br /> � .�, ✓1 'Z ��-� <br /> Gor on Mann Peter Ingram Ed Everett <br /> Public Works Superintendent Pubiic Works Se ices Director City Manager <br /> Attachments: None <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> GM/word/council report/sidewalW02-03TPSRPaccept <br />