My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-10-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:23:00 PM
Creation date
10/21/2004 1:19:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
10/25/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Proposition 70: Tribal Gaming Compacts. Exclusive Gaming Rights• Contributions to State. Page 1 of 4 <br /> �� ��� <br /> �E�gIS��ttV� <br /> ����� analyst's <br /> i --� office <br /> 60 I'EARS OF SERVICE <br /> Written July, 2004 <br /> Proposition 70 <br /> Tribal Gaming Compacts. Exclusive Gaming Rights. Contributions to State. <br /> Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. <br /> Background <br /> Indian Tribes in California . Under federal law, Indian tribes in Califomia are considered <br /> sovereign nations. As a result, tribes are not required to pay most federal, state, or local taxes <br /> (such as income, property, or sales tax). In addition, tribes are largely exempt from state laws, <br /> including California environmental and workplace laws. <br /> Gambling on Triba/ Lands. Federal law and the State Constitution allow tribes to conduct <br /> gambling on Indian land if they enter into agreements with the state. These agreements, called <br /> compacts, lay out the conditions under which the gambling may occur. Under current <br /> compacts, tribes may operate slot machines and card games, such as twenty-one. Other <br /> Nevada casino games such as craps and roulette are prohibited. Currently, 64 tribes <br /> have compacts and operate 53 casinos with a total of more than 54,000 slot machines. <br /> 1999 Compacts. Most tribes signed their current compacts in 1999. Under these compacts, a <br /> tribe may operate up to two facilities and up to a total of 2,000 slot machines. In exchange, <br /> tribes make some payments to the state which can only be used for specified purposes (such <br /> as for making payments to tribes that either do not operate slot machines or operate fewer <br /> than 350 machines). These payments total over $100 million annually. Under these compacts, <br /> tribes are required to prepare an environmental study analyzing the impact on the surrounding <br /> area of any new or expanded gambling facility. These compacts will expire in 2020. <br /> 2004 Compacts. In the summer of 2004, five tribes signed amendments to their 1999 <br /> compacts, and these revised agreements were approved by the state. Under these new <br /> agreements, these tribes may operate as many slot machines as they desire. In exchange, <br /> these tribes make a specified payment annually to the state, with additional payments for each <br /> slot machine added to their facilities. Payments to the state from these revised compacts are <br /> expected to total in the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Unlike the payments <br /> required by the 1999 compacts, the state can use these payments for any purpose. The newer <br /> compacts also require the tribes to (1) prepare more detailed environmental studies, (2) <br /> negotiate with local governments regarding payments addressing the impacts of new gambling <br /> facilities on the local communities, and (3) follow other provisions related to patron disputes, <br /> building codes, and labor relations. These new agreements expire in 2030, ten years later than <br /> the 1999 compacts. <br /> http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2004/70_11_2004.htm 10/15/2004 <br /> ... , _ , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.