Laserfiche WebLink
Proposition 70: Triba1 Gaining Compacts. Exclusive Gaming Rights. Contributions to State. Page 2 of 4 <br /> �4� � - <br /> Proposal <br /> This measure amends the State Constitution and state statutes to require the Govemor to <br /> amend an existing compact or enter into a new compact with any tribe within 30 days of a <br /> tribe's request. Any such compact would have to include certain provisions, as discussed <br /> below. <br /> Gambling Revenues. Under the provisions of the measure, a tribe entering into an amended <br /> or new compact would pay the state a percentage of its net income ftom gambling activities. <br /> The percentage of net income paid would be equivalent to the corporate tax rate paid by a <br /> private business (currently 8.84 percent). The measure specifies that the state could spend <br /> these revenues for any purpose. In the event that the tribes lose their exclusive right to <br /> conduct certain types of gambling in California , the tribes would no longer be required to make <br /> these payments to the state. These payments generally would be in place of any other state or <br /> local government fees, taxes, or levies on gambling activities. (Tribes, however, would still be <br /> required to make the specific payments required under the 1999 compacts.) <br /> Expansion of Gambling. The measure expands the types of games authorized by the <br /> compacts to include roulette, craps, and any other form of casino gambling. The measure <br /> eliminates the 1999 compact limit on the number of slot machines and facilities a tribe can <br /> operate on Indian lands. <br /> Compacts Extended. The measure specifies that any amended or new compact would <br /> remain in effect for 99 years. These compacts could be amended or renewed upon agreement <br /> of the Governor and a tribe and approval by the federal government. <br /> Environmenta/ Studies. As required under the 1999 compacts, any tribe entering a compact <br /> under this measure would be required to prepare an environmental study analyzing the impact <br /> on the surrounding area of any new or expanded tribal gambling facility. <br /> Re/ated Provisions in Proposition 68. Proposition 68 on this ballot also contains provisions <br /> affecting the number of slot machines authorized in the state. That measure would allow <br /> specified card rooms and racetracks to operate slot machines if tribes do not agree to make <br /> specified payments to the state and abide by certain state laws. The State Constitution <br /> provides that if the provisions of two approved propositions are in conflict, only the provisions <br /> of the measure with the higher number of yes votes at the statewide election take effect. <br /> Fiscal Effect <br /> Background. Over time, it is likely that additional tribes will seek amendments to their <br /> compacts similar to those agreed to by five tribes earlier this year. These amendments would <br /> allow tribes to exceed their current limit of 2,000 slot machines. As a result, over the next few <br /> years (absent any other changes), the state would likely experience: <br /> . Increased slot machines operated on Indian lands in the thousands. <br /> . Increased state revenues in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually. <br /> . Increased payments to local governments to address the impacts of gambling on <br /> communities in the millions of dollars annually. � <br /> http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballotl2004/70_11_2004.htm ] 0/15/2004 <br />