Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br /> Page 7 <br /> Option 1: Challen�e: <br /> ■ if traffic inrreases in future there may be a potential for delays <br /> Solutioi2: <br /> � people would change their commuter rautes and driving patterns to <br /> accommodate changes in traffic pattems. <br /> ■ Bike lane would get more peopl.e on bikes. <br /> Option 2: Challen�e: <br /> ■ Loss of parking <br /> ■ People driving faster with 4lanes <br /> ■ Safety issue with bike lanes <br /> Solution: <br /> ■ Use option 1 <br /> ■ Increase on-site parking <br /> * More signs to drive carefully <br /> Group 2: <br /> Option 1: Challen�e: <br /> ■ Losing traffic lane <br /> ■ Safety-parked cars vs.bikes <br /> ■ Circle Star building may become busier and effect traffic <br /> Solution: <br /> ■ Get people out of cars <br /> � Enforce no left turn out of Circle Star onto north baund Industria] <br /> ■ Implement option on a trial basis <br /> Optioxt 2: ChallenQe: <br /> ■ Lass of parking <br /> ■ Narrowing of lanes <br /> S�lution: <br /> ■ Enforce business use permits to ensure adequate parking for business <br /> custamers and employees <br /> ■ Permit systern for residential parking <br /> Suxnmarv <br /> Both groups seiected Option 1 as their preferred clnoice. Group 2 suggestea considering the <br /> options on a trial basis. Participants were encouraged to subrnit additional comments ta the <br /> R.edwood City Community Working Group on Bicycle and.Pedestrian Issues. The Bike/Ped <br /> group's website was listed on the meeting agenda and in publications and flyers. <br /> Next Steps: <br /> • I'CRC will compile notes and senc�to Red.wood City <br /> � Czty will review notes and consider�ption.s <br /> • Participants can continue to submit inpu.t to the RCBikePed working grou.p <br /> Evaluativn: <br /> Written evaluations taken at the meetin�and submitted to Redwood City <br /> Meeting facilitated by PCRC 650-513-033Q www.percweb.arg <br />