My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-10-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-10-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2013 11:45:25 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:54:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
10/9/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7A <br /> Page 6 <br /> What would be the benefits of Option 1? <br /> • Increase safety for vehicular traffic <br /> • Provide bike lane which is safer <br /> • No parking is lost <br /> • Paxking increases on 2 blocks <br /> + Reduces vehicular emissions�vhich reduces gIobal warining <br /> • Having bike Ianes encourages bike riding which reduces obesity <br /> • Bike route increases safety for pulling out anci left hirns <br /> What woald be the challenges of Option 1? <br /> • Potential d.elays with increased traffic <br /> • Changistg peoples attitudes of vehicular use and bike use <br /> How cauld the challenges be addressed? <br /> • Rerouting traffic and promoting increased bike use <br /> What would be the benefits of Option 2? <br /> • Keeps existing tratfic Ianes and ad.ds bike lanes <br /> • Easier to puli out of Centennial Neighborhood into traffic <br /> • Better visibility with a bike land buffer <br /> What wou�ld be the challenges of Option 2? <br /> • Lost parking on the residential side for both residents and businesses <br /> • Not as safe for cyclists-cars tend to go faster with 4lanes than 2 lanes- <br /> more inotorists changing lanes <br /> How could the challenges be addresaed? <br /> • Use option 1 <br /> • Increase on-site parking for businesses <br /> • Regtalate husinFSS parkin�(h�w many sp�ces/�uszness} <br /> • Erect safety signs to siow dowz�traffic for cyclists <br /> What might be other altexx�atives? <br /> • Ivothing. Other configurations would not be as safe <br /> • Creating physical barrier to sequester bath bike lanes.This would not be as safe <br /> on turns and would eliminate parking. <br /> Which of the propasals da you prefer? <br /> • Option l <br /> Grou�2: <br /> Recorder said nates were reflected in ReporE Out. Question number 7 is addressed <br /> below: <br /> What might be other alternafives? <br /> o A San C�rlos alternative supporting a protected bike path along the East side <br /> of 101 in Redwood Czty <br /> o Bike lanes on Old County Raad to Arguello <br /> o Dropping speed limif on In.dustrial to 25 mph <br /> Report Out• <br /> Group 1: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.