Laserfiche WebLink
� -- -- <br /> !l� �� <br /> TEA-21 EXTENSION APPROVED BY U.S. AB 1160 from page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • - • • • <br /> — HOUSE AND SENATE sack9round <br /> Earlier this week, both the House and Senate qg 1160 is an unprecedented effort to allow the <br /> took action on a 5-month extension of TEA-21 un,�l State to diCtBte the SpeCiflCS of loCal 2nd unit - <br /> February 29, 2004. The full House approved by ordinances. The measure is a follow-up to last <br /> voice vote its version, H.R. 3087, and the two year's AB 1866 (Wright), which required all second <br /> Senate committtees with primary jurisdiction over unit applications to be ministerial. <br /> surface transportation programs, the Senate <br /> Environment and Public Works Committee (which AB 1160 takes a one-size-fits-all approach to <br /> has jurisdiction over highway programs) and the second unit development and transfers significant <br /> Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs (which �oca) land use authority to Sacramento. SpeCifi- <br /> has jurisidiction over transit programs) approved 5- cally, the measure requires local governments to <br /> month extensions as well. The full Senate could <br /> bring the TEA-21 5-month extension legislation to Permit second units up to 1,200 square feet in all <br /> the floor as early as the end of this week. residential zones. Additionally, the bill prohibits <br /> local ordinances from including provisions that <br /> This short-term extension became necessary require an owner-occupant to live on the property <br /> after neither chamber was able to agree on a multi- �n either the primary or seCOndary unit. <br /> year authorization before the fiscal year expires <br /> September 30th. The most controversial issues The bill limits local parking standards to one <br /> thus far have been determining overall funding parking space for every two bedrooms created, <br /> levels and the mechanism for financing the trans- and permits these requirements to be met with on <br /> portation spending. Both the House and Senate street parking. In addition, AB 1160 also requires <br /> agree that the plan preferred by the Administration Cities to approve additional parking Standard <br /> is inadequate ($247 billion), but both chambers are reductions by as much as 33% if the development <br /> still close to $50 billion dollars apart with the House occurs within Y. mile of specified public transpor- <br /> T seeking $375 billion and the Senate $311 billion. tation. Finally, the bill prohibits loCal agenCieS frOm <br /> applying any development standard as a condition <br /> • . . • • . • • • • . • . for approval of a second unit that will render the <br /> TRIPLE-FLIP from page 1 unit "not financial/y feasib/e at market rate rents" <br /> for very low and low income households unless <br /> Of importance to cities, the SBOE has the city finds that the waiver of the condition will <br /> determined that the provisions of the "triple have an adverse impact. <br /> flip" bill regarding the change in rate are self- <br /> executing and, therefore, cities will not be AB 1160 was made a two-year bill. During the <br /> required by SBOE to adopt new ordinances. legistative interim, the Assembly Housing and <br /> Community Development Committee will hold <br /> The League has been in close contact with hearings on AB 1160 to discern whether there are • <br /> SBOE staff, which has been most cooperative and in fact problems with existing local second-unit <br /> understanding of cities' concerns. SBOE will form ordinances which merit this level of intrusion into <br /> an implementation task force to identify and local land use authority. The hearing has been <br /> resolve issues regarding the "triple flip." A working tentatively scheduled for November 18, 2003. <br /> group of city, county, League and CSAC staff and <br /> consultants also held a meeting to discuss opera- In preparation for these hearings, the League <br /> tional issues related to the "triple flip." Individuals hopes to work with cities to provide committee <br /> interested in participating in future task force members with a comprehensive local perspective <br /> meetings may contact either Frances Medema on the "second unit experience" cities have en- <br /> ( medemaf(o�cacities.orq) or Jean Korinke dured over the past year updating their ordinances <br /> (jkorinke@cacities.org). in the wake ofA6 1866. As a first step, the League <br /> will be sending a survey of second unit ordinances <br /> �. Continued on Page 5 <br /> PAGE 4/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org <br />