Laserfiche WebLink
j/. � -�� <br /> AB1160frompage4••••••••••••••• Le�islative Bill Action <br /> to cities throughout the state, and comments will � � � � � � � � � � � """" ""' • • • • `• <br /> be summarized to highlight key issues and pre- <br /> sented to Committee members to inform their The foilowing are summaries ofjust a few <br /> views on the topic. of the legislative bills that are currently being <br /> acted upon by the League of Caiifomia <br /> Cities. For more information about these <br /> Cities Can Help By: and other bills, please visit the League <br /> website's new "Issues and Advocacy" <br /> • Completing and Retuming the League 2^d page (www.cacities.or4/ <br /> Unit survey in a timely manner. issuesandadvocacvl — a one-stop location <br /> to access information about legisfation, <br /> • Getting on record in Opposition to AB 1160 Policy issues and related developments. <br /> — Send a letter to your Legislator and the Assem- You can track information on bills <br /> bly Housing and Community Development Com- ��•cacities.org/legtracking), locate <br /> mittee. legislators and legislative committees, send <br /> letters to legislators or the media through <br /> • Making it personal — Contact your legislator the online Advocacy Center, research <br /> and explain why she/he should not support AB League policy positions, access useful <br /> 1160. related links, and much more. <br /> Reaching out to citizens that regularly are <br /> involved in local land use decision-making and HOUSING AND LAND USE <br /> encouraging them to take a close look at AB 1160. <br /> (It is important for the public to understand the <br /> implications of the Legis/ature attempting to re- Affordable Housing a S ncet e <br /> write local ordinances in Sacramento, rather than found differences between the bill's supporters and <br /> al/owing these issues fo be decided at city halL) opponents could not be resolved as the legislative <br /> session wound down, Assembly Member Steinberg <br /> More information on AB 1160, including sample reluctantly made AB 1426 a two-year bill. As you <br /> opposition letters and talking points can be found may recall, AB 14 6 requires at least 10 percent of <br /> at www.cacities.org/hced. new building permits within the Sacramento region <br /> to be built for low and very low-income households. <br /> While the goal of the bill is laudable, the reality was <br /> that no funding was ever identified to support the <br /> � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � .. ■.. , effort. Affected local governments estimated the <br /> ■ � total subsidy cost to the region at over $500 million <br /> ; ■ over a five-year period, and this estimate was likely <br /> : SAVE THE DATE ! � to increase if recent state-imposed prevailing wage <br /> . ■ requirements were factored in to the calculation. In <br /> ' LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES : the end, the Lea 9 e and the American Planning <br /> . Association, alon with the California Building <br /> ; � Industry Association and local developers in the <br /> . LEGISLATIVE BRIEFINGS � region concluded that A 14 6 was certain to <br /> ; � increase development costs in the region. Given <br /> ' November 19 in Ontario . state budget realities, and little expectation of relief <br /> ; ■ from prevailing wage and other state requirements, <br /> . November 21 in Sacramento ; local governments can anticipate a continued effort <br /> � � to mandate a production requirement on local <br /> � � , � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � governments without accompanying resources. <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 5 <br />