Laserfiche WebLink
<br />¿/-!- 4- <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> <br />Response to Questions from the Third Study Session (August 22, 2004) <br /> <br />1. Provide the three things that make a Downtown Plan a success and the three <br />things that make it fail. Michael Freedman will address this question in his <br />opening comments. <br /> <br />2. What is the economic consultant's basis for believing that the furniture <br />business is under represented downtown? The economists were not <br />recommending that furniture stores, typically large buildings, be located in <br />downtown. They were suggesting home furnishing sales. Sales of home <br />furnishings occur in smaller spaces, are more compatible with a traditional <br />downtown, and this sector is under-represented in downtown Redwood City. <br /> <br />3. If a business that is currently operating in the proposed 'arts district' is no <br />longer a permitted use under the Precise Plan (in planner parlance it is 'legal <br />non-conforming') can the business expand? If yes, to what extent? This is a <br />good question. Staff will make a recommendation to the Planning Commission in <br />the draft Precise Plan and this recommendation will be forwarded to Council for <br />consideration. <br /> <br />4. What building heights are necessary for developers to break even on <br />projects? If a project was reduced by one story, how much would the City <br />have to subsidize the project to reach the break even point? The answer does <br />depend on the type of construction planned for any given site. However, for a <br />prototype downtown site and product, the 8-story level is the "break even" number <br />of stories. If the building height was lower than this, the project would not be feasible <br />without City subsidy, as it does not meet the developer's minimum profit <br />requirements (15%) for this type of construction. The removal of one floor would <br />bring the developer's return on investment to approximately 13.3%. For the <br />prototype site and product this would mean a required City subsidy of $1.75M. <br /> <br />5. What residential developers are looking at developing in downtown? Overten <br />different residential developers have expressed interest in developing in downtown <br />in the past six months. Most have been considering market rate condominiums <br />although some non-profit developers are also seeking sites, and one at least is <br />considering senior housing. Some have focused on a particular site; others have <br />looked at multiple locations. We have not listed the names here because this might <br />interfere with negotiations they may be pursuing. <br /> <br />6. How will the plan deal with design guidelines? Provide a couple of examples. <br />We think that this will be most effectively answered in the draft plan that will be <br />reviewed by the City. Staff will make proposals which the Planning Commission will <br />review and make recommendations to Council. <br /> <br />4 <br />