My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-07-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-07-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2011 9:40:02 AM
Creation date
7/11/2011 9:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
7/11/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.D. -Page 5 <br />s <br />\" <br />TASERS <br />Standardizing to Save Lives and Reduce Injuries <br />Issue <br />Have the law enforcement agencies in San Mateo County adopted a standardized TASER <br />policy and, if so, is it effective? <br />Summary <br />This investigation focused on 20 uniformed police agencies of all cities /towns and the Sheriff's <br />Department in San Mateo County, the California Highway Patrol, and BART (Bay Area Rapid <br />Transit) Police. It was found that only two cities, Menlo Park and East Palo Alto, currently do <br />not employ TASER devices. Standardizing TASER device use policies and training would <br />provide law enforcement agencies with a unified understanding of appropriate response to event. <br />within and across jurisdictions in the County. Of those agencies using TASER devices, the use <br />of force policies and training requirements are sufficiently similar to consider them standardized, <br />with the exception of the Sheriff's Use of Force policy. <br />The 2011 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury recommends that the Sheriff either adopt a Use of <br />Force policy that is consistent with the other agencies in the County or reinstate the Sheriff's <br />prior Use of Force policy dated April 10, 2008. It also recommended that uniformed officers <br />across the County who are required to have a firearm while on duty carry this less- than - deadly <br />force tool whenever they carry a firearm. It is further recommended that all agencies track the <br />use of the TASER device to obtain control of subjects, even when the subject is not actually <br />"tased." <br />Background <br />The TASER, a branded electronic control device (ECD), is a device manufactured by TASER <br />International, Inc. that employs a high voltage, low amperage shock that is momentarily painful <br />to the subject in a manner that causes the subject to lose muscle control and, if standing, fall to <br />the ground. It works by the use of compressed gas to propel two barbs, attached by very thin <br />wires, toward the subject. Once the barbs attach to skin or clothing, the shock is applied. It has <br />an effective range of approximately 6 to 25 feet, thus allowing the officer to avoid immediate <br />physical contact with the subject. The TASER device can also be used as a "stun gun" in what is <br />called "drive stun" mode.' The TASER device is used by police officers to bring a subject under <br />control, offering a less lethal option than a firearm. <br />' A TASER device can directly deliver an electrical shock from the device itself without the use of wires or barbs, <br />but such requires physical contact with the subject. It does not incapacitate the subject, but uses momentary pain as <br />the method of obtaining control. A "drive stun" is police terminology for approaching a subject to apply a TASER <br />in the drive stun mode. The cartridge that is on the TASER device must be removed to use it in this way. This <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.