My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-07-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-07-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2011 9:40:02 AM
Creation date
7/11/2011 9:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
7/11/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.1. - Page 1 <br />REPORT <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the City Manager <br />July 11, 2011 <br />SUBJECT <br />Acceptance of Grand Jury Report on Wireless Cell Towers <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Approve the Grand Jury report dated May 19, 2011 with the finding that the Grand Jury <br />recommendations have been implemented by the City of Redwood City. <br />BACKGROUND <br />On May 19, 2011 the San Mateo County Grand Jury released a report regarding the <br />regulation of cell tower installations in San Mateo County (Attachment 1). This report <br />responds to public opposition on how cell towers regulations were being processed and <br />identified a need for providing clear information to the public. The report also prescribes <br />that specific maintenance and upgrade requirements be included in lease agreements <br />for cell tower installations that are a source of revenue for cities and the County. <br />Information collected by the Grand Jury in 2011 indicates that San Mateo County and <br />eighteen out of twenty cities in the County reported public opposition to a cell tower <br />application within the past five years. The County and six out of twenty cities reported <br />public opposition to cell tower applications more frequently than once a year. The report <br />also found that some cities did not require service providers to maintain cell towers and <br />or remove installations when they are no longer used, become obsolete or the permit <br />expires. Public opposition occurs most often from individuals living in close proximity to <br />a proposed cell tower site. To date, per the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, <br />concerns about electromagnetic radiation are regarded as scientifically unproven. <br />Federal law also governs some cell tower decision - making authority; for example, each <br />application by a service provider must be considered on an individual basis and one <br />government entity cannot favor one telecommunications provider over another. <br />City staff have reviewed the Grand Jury report in detail and prepared a response to the <br />Superior Court of California, San Mateo County, (Attachment 2). Responses are due <br />within 90 days from the date of the Grand Jury finding (no later than August 17, 2011). <br />As indicated in the City's reply letter to the Grand Jury, Redwood City is in agreement <br />and in substantial compliance with the Grand Jury recommendations, and confirms that <br />the specific Grand Jury recommendations have been implemented as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.