Laserfiche WebLink
deliver and pick -up small children and that the people should be involved in the <br />decision. <br />Rudy Luca agreed with Option #3 so that the people have a right to a hearing to <br />express views on why they do or do not approve. Whether there are restrictions or <br />not, the problem exists because the right option is not in place. There are <br />problems to be considered and the only way to approach that is to have a hearing. <br />Shannon Lee Collins, a family child care provider, stated that it is difficult to get <br />people to come out and make a stand when something works. She stated that <br />young families depend on it and love coming to a home based center in their <br />community. It is a misperception that these are large centers and she stated that <br />there is a limit on the growth and most providers do not care for the maximum of <br />14 children due to scheduling and other considerations. She urged that Option #1 <br />is the best and Option #2 would be the next best alternative. <br />Lori de Martini stated that she is a day care provider in Belmont where there are <br />conditional use permits, therefore, there are very few child care spots available <br />and she often times needs to refer clients outside of the Belmont area. She stated <br />that she charges higher rates than most Redwood City providers because of the <br />limited openings in the area. She stated that there is a 40% turnover which would <br />mean conducting many hearings before the City Council and encouraged studying <br />how this might encourage or discourage future providers. <br />Mayor Claire explained that the issues mentioned by Mr. Wolfskill were land use <br />problems where the front yard had an easement across it that was owned by his <br />next door neighbors who were using it as a driveway to get to a garage many <br />years ago. The problem had more to do with many cars sifting right in his front <br />yard that he did not own. <br />Mayor Claire asked various questions of staff. Council comments included that it <br />is important that residents have the opportunity to discuss concerns and Option #3 <br />will encourage working toward consensus with neighbors. <br />M/S Hartnett/Ira to adopt Option #3, involving a modified conditional use permit <br />process with a public notice and hearing to approve large family day care homes. <br />A draft ordinance to be prepared and placed on a future consent calendar. The <br />motion passed by a majority roll call vote with Mayor Claire voting no and <br />Council Member Jordan absent. MINUTE ORDER 03 -210 <br />9. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST <br />A. Legislation (information only) - This sub - section involves possible discussion of <br />City Position on Proposed Legislation described in the League of California Cities <br />Priority Focus Bulletin No. 31 -2003 and No. 32 -2003. Council may direct staff to <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 25, 2003 <br />MINUTES PAGE 10 <br />MINUTES Book No. 60 <br />Page No. 45 <br />