My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
MO 76 1-150
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minute Orders
>
1970-1979 (Partial)
>
1976
>
MO 76 1-150
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2011 8:33:01 AM
Creation date
8/1/2011 8:32:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minute Order
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/6/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. � - � <br /> 3. Liquefaction: The last sentence in the second paragraph <br /> on page F-16 should be improved by being reworded as <br /> follows: "Extensive testin9 for this factor has been <br /> carried out in Redwood Peninsula and Bair Island since <br /> 1965, and it can be cencluded that soils materials there <br /> should remain stable under conditions of strong seismic <br /> shaking and that the occurrence of liquefaction is <br /> highly unlikely." <br /> 4. Pages F-14 through F-17 were meant to be illustrative <br /> examples pointing the direction toward the accomplish- <br /> ment of the second and third specific goals listed on <br /> page F-13. The contents of the illustrative examples, <br /> taken by themselves, will not stand up under scrutiny. <br /> For example, the map on page F-17 represents the "seismic <br /> intensity and level of hazard" for a single occurrence <br /> of the same magnitude and at the same epicenter as the <br /> 1906 San Francisco earthquake. This certainly does not <br /> cover the field sufficiently to evaluate the "level of <br /> ' hazard" from seismic occurrences in a responsible manner. <br /> Since the examples are so easy to misinterpret, and since <br /> it would be virtually impossible to label them so that <br /> they wouldn't be misconstrued by someone, pages F-14 <br /> through F-17 should be removed at this time, along with <br /> the parenthetical references to them on page F-13, to be <br /> replaced at some future time with the actual products <br /> called for in the two specific proposals mentioned on <br /> page F-13. <br /> The motion carried unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> In response to question, City Attorney Schricker advised that <br /> Chapter V. of the Plan may be referred to staff for additional in- <br /> formation at this time and adopted later, but will remain part of <br /> the public hearing process which has taken place on the Plan. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by Councilman Leipzig, <br /> � that Chapter V. entitled "Economic and Fiscal Implications of the <br /> General Plan" be removed from the proposed General Plan for con- <br /> sideration at this time and be referred to staff for further review <br /> and presentation to Council at a future date. <br /> The motion carried unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Williams moved, seconded by Councilman Barrett, <br /> that in Section D. Open Space Element, page D-16 under "5. Proposals", <br /> item g"Leave Stulsaft Park, as much as possible, in its natural <br /> state" be deleted. <br /> ADDITION TO MOTION: Councilman Williams, with the consent of his <br /> second, added that on page D-17 in the item relating to Stulsaft <br /> Park, "leave natural" be stricken, and "study" used in its place.._ ._ <br /> The motion with the addition carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> � —.2 — - - � <br /> ,y. �- 9G-� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.