Laserfiche WebLink
28�8 <br /> GENERAL PROGRAMS (continued) <br /> MOTION Counc�lman Bury moved, seconded by Councilman Vega, to <br /> increase the contribution to the San Mateo County Convention and <br /> Visitors Bureau from the reco�nended 12% of estimated hote�l-motel <br /> tax revenue to 15% of that revenue, or a total contribution of 1 <br /> $12,525 <br /> It was pointed out that a similar motion made at the �May 7, 1977 <br /> Budget Study Session had failed (see pages 6 and 7 of the Minutes <br /> for that date), but that recognition should be given,to the fact <br /> that many serv�ce employees in other cities are residents of <br /> Redwood City, and there is, for that reason, an indirect benefit <br /> to the City from business generated by the Bureau <br /> � Councilman Barrett stated for the record the consensus of Council <br /> that the San Mateo County-Redwood City Chamber of Commerce should <br /> be urged to conduct the annual "Planning for Progress" seminar in <br /> San Mateo County. <br /> The motion carried by ma�ority voice vote which Flayor Leipzig de- <br /> termined to be a vote of 4-3 <br /> Mayor Leipzig stated for the record that she opposes the expenditure <br /> of $2,000 for the Fourth of July fireworks display, stating that the <br /> money could be better spent elsewhere in the City at this time <br /> Zuma Francis (see above) su9gested pedestrian activated traffic <br /> signals be installed approx�mately halfway between Jefferson and <br /> Roosevelt on El Camino Real � <br /> POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION (pp. 73-81) <br /> Legislative/Policy Determination (Citv Council) <br /> MOTION Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by Councilman <br /> Bury, that in accordance with the Legislat�ve Corrmittee <br /> Report No 77-2 of Apr�l 11, 1977 that the per diem allowance <br /> for members of the City Council be increased from $35 00 to <br /> $50 00; and that reimbursement for intra-county motor vehicle <br /> expense be eliminated. <br /> Discussion followed concerning the experience of Council members <br /> with regard to increased costs of traveling on City business, <br /> the fact that �t is neither reasonable to expect Council mem- <br /> bers to lose money when representing the City out of town nor <br /> fair to their families, the need to recognize that modest enter- <br /> tainment of those from whom the City may be requesting assis- <br /> tance is necessary i� many cases, the anticipated loss of <br /> reimbursement of local motor vehicle expense to offset the pro- <br /> posed increase, and the fact that present Council policy permits <br /> only a representative group of inembers to attend necessary <br /> meetings _ � <br /> The motion carried by ma�ority voice vote. <br /> (MINUTE ORDER N0. 77-113) <br /> Ad� Mtg -10- <br /> Budget <br /> 6/4/77 <br />