|
. _ _—�-- --- —�r — . _ �, — ---- -- � �.�
<br /> � _ , ' „ s� , • —
<br /> Issues�Concerm ng PRISM System, page 1 ��
<br /> , � , i , , + . , , ��
<br /> i, No definite answers are possible since it is�true no
<br /> ,'�final decisions have been mad'e', but the type�of'informa-
<br /> , tion to be provided is intended to provide for better
<br /> ,`' � cortunumcation between citi'es and� the County of San r
<br /> Mateo. �" �',' '
<br /> , ,; , � �. ,
<br /> i
<br /> 2 The pro�ected cost will�be closer to $175,OOO�per yearx
<br /> �� the total pro,7ect rather �than the higher �
<br /> ` Redwood City would contribute a share of�the 'pro�ect
<br /> cost.
<br /> � . ' , , 9 ' ?i�
<br /> 3 It would be expected the pro,7ect would be an addition to
<br /> the City's police information system
<br /> . , '� ,s � . � , � , , , � ,r
<br /> i Paragraph 2,"page 2- If the basic'issues surrounding PRISM
<br /> are not resolved by December, 1977, then the system would
<br /> ' self-destruct, since nothing'would exist with which to make
<br /> a� commi tment:: % �, , � � � � < r ,
<br /> . � , .�. _
<br /> Issues Concerning Joint Powers Agreement, page 2
<br /> , � � - _ _. � , ,r
<br /> ,
<br /> 1. Rather than "representatives from each participating
<br /> City"„ the line should�be changed to "a representative
<br /> from each... ".� , � ,, �, � (, � .
<br /> 7 The reference to "at least 15 cities" with regard t,o�;,the
<br /> ., effective date of the agreement should be deleted, since �
<br /> � if ma,7or cities such as Redwood City or San Mateo did not
<br /> � participate, the prd�ect could not become effective, wh�le
<br /> � the~absence of some'of the smaller cities would not have
<br /> the same effect.
<br /> _ . � - , ' � ,a ,. � �
<br /> Concerns, page 3 '` '' � � "�
<br /> ,, 1- The�comments regarding the possibility of an "old" council
<br /> committing a"new" council to a budget allocation in an
<br /> .. election year are valid and paragraph , 16 of the proposed
<br /> ' agreement should be rewritten '
<br /> � i �,� .
<br /> 2 Paragraph 13 of the proposed agreement is not intended to
<br /> �c f ommi�t financially the signatories through June, 1978
<br /> � t < .�� {� i� i�
<br /> ,r v �
<br /> 3 There would be no problem if Paragraph 9 of the proposed
<br /> agreement were changed to provide charges for services
<br /> : should be.,limited to actual cost of services
<br /> , , , _
<br /> 4 Federal and state funding woul probably not, be �rel'eased
<br /> if ma,7or cities did not partic�pate.� >.
<br /> a
<br /> Recommendations
<br /> � . All of the recommendations are acceptable ,
<br /> `(Recommendations are '
<br /> , . . .' _r.. _...�.� '
<br /> -2- _ Reg Mtg
<br /> 6/6/77
<br /> r_
<br />
|