Laserfiche WebLink
362 <br /> Doug Christensen, Executive Council of Homeowners Associations, <br /> stated that only Redwood Clty is allocating water to �rrigation <br /> accounts of condominiums on the basis of 50% of the water used for <br /> the same period in 1976 rather than making only the same 25� re- <br /> duction allocated to conventional single-family homes He sug- <br /> gested that discrimination exists and urged that Casa Puebla <br /> Homeowners be allocated the amount requested ' <br /> In response to question, Director of Public Works Pusich advised <br /> that the condom�nium homeowners receive the same individual resi- <br /> dence allocation as other homeowners, but that there �s a separate <br /> meter for the irrigation account which is allocated 50% of the <br /> 1976 usage in accordance with the provisions of the water emer- <br /> gency ordinance for such meters Mr Pusich advised further that, <br /> on the basis of agricultural studies, adequate minimal needs of <br /> landscaping of individual dwelling units on the average 60-foot <br /> lot is est�mated to be between three and four units per billing <br /> period. He said that the sub�ect condom�um is getting about 3z <br /> units of landscaping water per dwelling unit on the present 50% <br /> allocation and suggested that the common area is not as large as <br /> the combined landscaped area of a comparable number of single- <br /> family lots. <br /> In response to question, Assistant City Manager Smith stated that <br /> the C�ty is attempting to adm�nister the water emergency program <br /> with a minimum number of people at the lowest possible cost to the <br /> taxpayers. He acknowledged that in such c�rcumstances inequit�es <br /> may occur which can be corrected if brought to the attention of <br /> staff, but observed that a water emergency exists <br /> ' MOTION Councilman Rhodes moved, seconded by Councilman Norris, , <br /> to reverse the decision of the Director of Public Works and grant <br /> the Casa Puebla Homeowners Associat�on a water allocation equiva- <br /> lent to the amount represented by a 25% reduct�on in the amount <br /> of water used for the same billing period in 1976 for their <br /> irrigation account <br /> The motion carried on the follow�ng roll call vote <br /> a <br /> Ayes Councilmen Biagi, Norris, Rhodes, Vega <br /> Noes Councilmen Barrett, Bury and Mayor Leipzig <br /> (MINUTE ORDER N0. 77-169) <br /> Hearing - Appeal of the denial of the Director of Public Works of <br /> � application for i�creased water allocation - E L <br /> Richardson, The Wash House Coin Laundr , 3106 Rolison <br /> Road, appel ant <br /> Eugene L R�chardson, owner, The Wash House Coin Laundry, 3106 <br /> Rolison Road, referred to his appeal letter of July 15, 1977. He <br /> advised that as a new laundry, he does not have water use experience <br /> for, the base year and stated that his present allocation of 85 <br /> units monthly is less than that allocated to smaller similar <br /> laundries based on their usage experience. Mr Richardson stated ' <br /> that to break even in his business operating his present equipment, <br /> he would require 142 units monthly Mr Richardson urged that his <br /> allocation be increased <br /> 4 <br /> Reg Mtg -2- <br /> 8/8/77 <br /> / � �� <br />