|
�oo �
<br /> Anthony;Burciaga, muralist,.showed slides depicting the site and the
<br /> mural: design�which consists of.drawings of folk dances of Mexico
<br /> Mr "Burciaga invited everyone,present visit,the site,and�en�oy the
<br /> mural� which w�yll �take;about;tthree to _complete., � `
<br /> Mayon�Leipng�thanked Mr Burciaga�for his presentati�on,and, '
<br /> ever-yone .to�acceptiMr: Burciaga��s �nvi,tation � �
<br /> Publ'ic�Heartng - Proposed•Human,Services Element of the General Plan
<br /> Mayor�Leipn g�advised�that�thetproposed Human�Services,Elemen,t-of._the
<br /> General,'Plan�must�be_returned to the,Plan m,ng•Commission
<br /> a�procedural"error The•City Clerk,was,directed to
<br /> public�hearing,of„ the,proposed�Element�when..it is returned,,to.,the,.
<br /> ' City,Council�. (MINUTE�ORDER�N0,�,77-207)
<br /> PubdicrHearing for�Planned.Development Permit to allow
<br /> c onstruction of 12 dwellinq um ts;`104�Central -—
<br /> Avenue.- Ni15 Haga; applicant "`"` --�`-"'---""
<br /> Mayor Leipzag,declared open at 7 50 p m., the sub�ect public,hearing.
<br /> City�Clerk�Hildebrand�repor,ted the Affidavit of Publication�of Notice
<br /> of Hearang;and the Affidavrt,of Mailing in her office
<br /> Fred Blomquist, 1"and surveyor,�representing�the,applicant, adv,ised
<br /> that the�proposed development desagn w,ill be,the,same as that�o,f,;the
<br /> three�units constructed,on an�ad,7acent±,lot�and that the_present ,
<br /> applacation is for•only�i2.umts,,not,the_15,for-whach�application
<br /> was:prevaouslyrmade.
<br /> Discussion fol,lowed,and:Mr:,Blomqu,�st,and_Planner�III,Schoenfeld
<br /> commented:and.replied,to�questions concerning the,number of,trees to
<br /> be saved;,the fact that the purpose.of�a�P,lanned,Development,Permit
<br /> is to prov,ide,for unique development,design which�is more desirable
<br /> than what might other,w�se be constructedlon,the�same�site in acco'r-
<br /> dance with its zoning, whether or not the.proposed_development offers
<br /> any, benefnt to the City,�which might,cause it,to,qualify,for•a Planned
<br /> Development Per,mit;, the• fact that the p_r,oposed is,more �
<br /> desirable than those, prev,iously� pr,oposed�IforFthe same, site, the need
<br /> for lower income housang.in the C�ty, and,whether.or-�not increased�
<br /> traffic would: be, an�'important cons in, the, dev,elopment„
<br /> City Attorney� Schr.icker,�advised that a, prerequ,isi,te for Counc�l
<br /> approval of a PDP is consideration of the releted environmental
<br /> impact report Mr. Schricker advnsed that if'any,Counci,l members
<br /> have not reviewed the EIR or do, not reca,ll� its, con,tent, those mem-
<br /> bers would not be qualified to vo,te on ttie sub�ect appl�ication
<br /> Mr Schricker noted that the EIR was submitted,some time ago and
<br /> that that the application before Council at this time� is not the
<br /> first such proposed development for the proper,ty�. `
<br /> (Councilman Barrett arrived at 8.06 p.m.)' 1
<br /> MOTION Councilman Rhodes moved, seconded by Councilman Norris,
<br /> that consideration of the sub�ect application be continued until
<br /> �na next Council meeting in order that all Council members may have
<br /> time to restudy the related EIR.
<br /> Reg Mtg -2-
<br /> 9/19/77
<br />
|