My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1977
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
CC MIN 1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2016 11:11:42 AM
Creation date
8/2/2011 4:06:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1976
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1.� �, <br /> ��- K <br /> ��,_- � >� ,- <br /> In response to question regarding the earliest date when new plans <br /> might be presented for development of the property, City Attorney <br /> Schricker advised that any of the su9gested alternatives could be <br /> presented at any time and a building permit would be issued since <br /> they all meet requirements of the Zoning Ord�nance. <br /> ' The motlon carried unanimously by voice vote.(MINUTE ORDER NO 77-49) <br /> Public Hearing - Resolution of Intention of the Planning Comm s ston <br /> ' initiatinq proceedings to add Section 30.17 <br /> Ordinance No 1130 relatinq to improvement of <br /> parkiny lots <br /> Mayor Leipzig declared open at 8 03 p.m. the sub,7ect public hearing. <br /> Czty Clerk Hildebrand reported that the Affidavit of Publication of <br /> Not�ce of Hearing is on file in her office. <br /> in response to question Planning Director Schroeter advised that it <br /> is not the intent of the proposed ordinance that the lots used for <br /> parking of new and used cars by car dealerships would be cons�dered <br /> as parking lots, and acknowledged that the wording of paragraph (a) <br /> may be unclear, although dealerships are a distinct business and not <br /> cons�dered parking lots. <br /> In further response to questions from Counc�l members and City At�torney <br /> Schricker, Mr. Schroeter advised that the purpose of the proposed <br /> ordinance is to prov�de authority to the City to clean up vacant lots <br /> where cars are parked or stored, often without the consent of the <br /> ' property owner; that property owners would not be required to pave <br /> and stripe the lots unless they wish to use them for parking lots, <br /> that commerc�al parking lots are not allowed in res�dential districts <br /> unless tihey are part of an apartment development, that there has been <br /> public demand that the improperly used lots be cleaned up, that simi- <br /> lar ord�nances have been adopted in nearby cities, that consideration <br /> has been given to c�her methods of handl�ng the matter such as en- <br /> forcement of the abandoned veh�cle laws, noting that the cars are not <br /> abandoned; and that damage is done resulting in broken curbs and <br /> sidewaiks and street maintenance and clean-up problems � <br /> Mayor Leipz�g invited anyone present who wished to speak to do so <br /> No one wlshed to speak. <br /> MOTION Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman Rhodes, to � <br /> close the public hearing . <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> The public hearing was closed a� 8.14 p m <br /> City Attorney Schricker recoriunended that the proposed ordinance be <br /> returned to staff for redrafting and revisions which would incor- <br /> porate some of the remarks made with regard to interpretation. Mr <br /> ' Schricker advised that since the hearing has been held, and if there <br /> is general agreement, the proposed ordinance could be placed on the <br /> Consent Calendar at the next Council meeting. <br /> -3- <br /> Reg Mtg <br /> , _ 3/14/77 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.