Laserfiche WebLink
1�'7 4 , - - , <br /> Public Hearing - Appeal from the denial by the Planninq Commission of <br /> �-- Apolication for Variance to pe rmit construct�on of <br /> t hree additional dwellinq units behind an existing <br /> dwelling unit with a 13-foot side•yard�access setback <br /> where_18 feet �s:re u�red 1154 Clrnton Street - <br /> C. E. Stewart, Appe ant � ^� <br /> Mayor Leipzig declared open at,7.37 p.m. the sub�ect public hearing ' <br /> p City Clerk Hildebrand reported that the Affidavit of Publication of � <br /> Not�ce of Hearirig and the Affidavit of"Mailing are on file Fier <br /> _ , <br /> off�ce. <br /> Mayor Leipz�g called attention to the mater�al rece�ved by Council <br /> contaim ng Planriing Commiss�on M�nutes and P,4anm,ng Department reports. <br /> C E Stewart, 416 Compass Drive, the appellant, referred to h�s <br /> testimony conta�ned in the P1am m �g Commission Minutes. Mr. Stewart <br /> stated that ttie d�stance between his'building and the;bu�lding on the <br /> ad�acent property is 16z feet and later` acknowledged he owns <br /> only 13 feet of the space. r ' � + ' <br /> In response to questions, P,lanriing Director Schrpeter explained that <br /> the Planning;Comm�ssion is asked to m3ke'f�ndings'and those f�ndings <br /> are usually'expres`sed by the maker`�of the motion; that'personal ob- <br /> servat�ons atiout condit�on`s of'a ng�ghbor,hood are acceptabl�, that <br /> where proposed'�development�meets all Cit,y"requirements, the impres- <br /> sions of inembers of the Planning Commission would'not`be a consider- <br /> ation,'and tiiat the Plann�n9 Commjsston could�not deny'an application <br /> for a bu�ldtng �f all requ�rements of tfie Zom ng'Ordinan4e are <br /> met. � ,,. , , ., 2 <br /> Attention was called to the three alternative uses or development ' <br /> suggested by staff wh�ch would'meet the requirements of the'Zom ng <br /> - Ordinence and Mr. Schroeter cominented 'and`repli'ed to quest�ons con- <br /> cerning them. � � �" ' <br /> � Mayor Leipzig invited anyone else present who w�shed to speak to do , <br /> , so. No one present wished to speak. � � � <br /> ' MOTION Councilman Barrett moved,seconded by Counc�lman Vega, to <br /> close the public hearing. ' �� <br /> The motion carr�ed u by votce vote. <br /> The publ�c hearing was closed at 7.50 p m. � <br /> Discussion continued and Mr Schroeter commented and replied to ques- <br /> tions concerning the existing alternatives for development of the <br /> sub�ect property, the age of the present dwelling;' tlie fact that the <br /> nei9hborhood is mostly older single-family dwell�ngs,with some multiple <br /> family dwellings; and the lack of adequate,garages,of older homes. <br /> MOTION• Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by .Counc�lman Norris, to <br /> uphold the decision of the Planriing Commission and,deny`the'appeal <br /> of C. E Stewart'for a veriance to pe`rmit construct�on of three � <br /> additional dwelling umts beh�nd an existirig dwelli,ng�umt' w�th a <br /> 13-foot�side yard access setback where 18 feet'is requ�red at 1154 <br /> Clirton Street' N , <br /> -2- <br /> Reg.Mtg <br /> 3/14/77 <br />