Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> �, <br /> � � ` <br /> _ , <br /> most homeowners would be penalized by increased taxes Mr. Stango stated, <br /> however, that he disagrees with the thtrd point in Mr. Ference's report. <br /> Gregor Strom, appraiser from Marshall & Stevens, advised that this year <br /> each piece of property was reappraised and that differences may exist <br /> because, in the past, it was generally considered home values increased <br /> about 20% per year recently and appratsals were simply "indexed" <br /> ' accordingly. In response to the suggestion that since the amount of <br /> debt service remains the same, if assessments increase, it would appear <br /> that there is a shift to homeowners for a larger portion of the district <br /> tax. Mr. Strom stated that resident7al property is appreciating much <br /> faster than raw land which accounts for most of the difference Also, <br /> �he noted, that some properties wh�ch are outside the levees and sub�ect <br /> to tidal action were valued much too high and were reduced, being un- � <br /> likely to be developed in the foreseeable future. <br /> Director of Finance Ference described the basis for determining the fair <br /> market value wh�ch he is required to do as District Assessor. He advised <br /> that for he uses market information such as sales of similar <br /> properties, etc., not7ng he cannot �gnore the fact that the value of <br /> residential property has increased greatly in recent years while the <br /> value of raw or industrial land has risen much more slowly, therefore, <br /> a greater proportton of the District tax must be sh5fted to resident�al <br /> property. Mr. Ference po�nted out that the same is true everywhere else <br /> in California also. <br /> Discussian followed and Mr Ference and Mr. Stango commented and replied <br /> to questions regarding specific properties. <br /> Vic Wandmayer, resident of GID No 1-64 in the real estate business, <br /> described his experience with values of commercial and industrial <br /> ' properties, suggesting they have begun to increase lately. <br /> Don Warren, Mob�l Oil Estates (Redwood) Limited, acknowledged that it is <br /> true that property developed for commercial use has increased in value, <br /> but that in order to make raw land saleable for development considerable <br /> expense is required and, therefore, such land has much less value. He <br /> noted that any raw land wh�ch has been improved for development since <br /> 61arch 1, 1978 would not be included vn the rolls until next year He <br /> observed that when the commercial lands are devetoped they will bear <br /> a larger part of the District tax, stating that the key to lowering <br /> the homeowner's taxes is development of the coimnercial land <br /> Discussion follo�aed and Mr. warren commen�ea anu repiieu r.o yuesL�ons <br /> concerning details relating to certain parcels and suggestion was made <br /> that �t would be desirable to know the effect on the value of property <br /> of zo��ing changes whether or not any �inprovements are made to the land • <br /> Ron MacQuarrie, 553 Keelson Circle, stated that there are inconsistencies <br /> with regard to valuation and cited several examples Mr Strom and Mr <br /> Ference replied regarding the examples cited and discussed difficulties <br /> of Marine World and their appeals of assessments in past years. <br /> Discussion continued and Mr. Strom and Mr. Ference commented and replied <br /> to questions regarding appraisal procedures for the current roll, the <br /> � possibility of reviewing the valuation p1aced on useable parcels, <br /> whether the value of the number of new homes expected to be on the rolls <br /> next March could be reported now as information, whether any drop in <br /> tax next year can be anticipated as a result of that development, and <br /> whether any significant drop in homeowner taxes must await commercial <br /> development in Redwood Shores <br /> -2- Qd/Equal <br /> 8/21/78 <br />