My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1978
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
CC MIN 1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2011 4:22:28 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 4:21:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/9/1978
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a 4 <br /> R� � � <br /> -- �--i <br /> Mr. Stango (see above) suggested there is a discrepancy in some in- <br /> stances between the assessed value of developable residential properties <br /> , and the value placed on the land of a parcel on which a house has been <br /> constructed. Mr. Ference explained that in certain cases such lots may <br /> appear similar to neighboring lots, but they have not been buildable <br /> because of water problems, etc. <br /> Mr. MacQuarrie (see above) stated that he has been aware of sonie such ' <br /> lots, but that those of concern to RSHA are lots in developments vrhere <br /> those which had homes constructed on them as of March 1 had much higher ' <br /> land values placed on them than on vacant ad�acent lots which have since <br /> been built upon. Mr. Strom said that the difference should be between <br /> one and two thousand dollars, but Mr. MacQuarrie cited examples of lots <br /> where the difference was $10-15,000 and offered his list of such properties <br /> to Mr. Strom for further investigation <br /> Mr Warren (see above) sketched on the blackboard to indicate where some <br /> value differences may lie. , <br /> Comment was made concerning previous poor experience with the quality <br /> of work performed by the representative of Marshall & Stevens assigned <br /> to the City and that �t was hoped that situation had been improved <br /> It was suggested that wh�le some small percentage of error might be � <br /> reasonable, the City is not prepared to accept another similar situation <br /> w�th the outside appraiser. <br /> Discussion follotved and Mr. Fales, Mr Ference and Mr. MacQuarrie com- <br /> mented and replied to questions concerning investigation of any alleged <br /> �ncons�stencies �n valuation. Mr. MacQuarrie provided his list of the <br /> parcels in question, and Mr. Warren offered assistance in identifying <br /> them and advising of any present plans for undeveloped parcels. <br /> CONSENSUS Mayor Barrett determined that it was the consensus of Council � <br /> that the investigation of possible assessment inconsistencies be made <br /> and the report considered by Counctl before District taxes are equalized. - <br /> Fld,7ournment <br /> MOTIqN. Director 6iagi moved, seconded by Director Norris, to continue <br /> the meeting of the Board of Equalization until 4•00 p m, Monday, <br /> August 28, 1978 in the Community Activities Building <br /> The motion carried unan�mously by voice vote <br /> The Board of Di�ectors ad,7ourned at 11 30 a.m. <br /> (NOTE• A General Meeting of the Qoard of Dtrectors of GID No. 1-64 <br /> wtll take place at 7.30 p.m , Monday, August 28, 1978 in the Board of <br /> Supervisors Chambers, 401 Marshall Street.) <br /> � <br /> '� Bd/Equal <br /> " 8/21/78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.