Laserfiche WebLink
��r� � <br /> , - ar. <br /> 0 <br /> Account No. 486 (continued) - � <br /> In response to question, Mr. Fales said that with regard to funds <br /> for workers compensat�on, spec�al trust fund accounting will be con- <br /> sidered later. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Rhodes moved, seconded by Councilman Bury, that <br /> ' Account No. 486 not be approved but be held over until Council has <br /> had an opportunity to approve social service items separatel,y. <br /> - The motion carried unam mously by voice vote. <br /> Approval of Account No. 486 was withheld in accordance with the ��_ <br /> motion above. , <br /> City Controller - Account No. 489 (Budyeted Reserves) (pp. 28-29) <br /> Mr. Fales acknowledged that the reserve is not sufficient for a <br /> city of the size of Redwood City with a budget of the size recom- <br /> mended. Mr. Fales suggested that consideration of the sub�ect <br /> account be withheld at this time since the amount in reserve will <br /> depend upon selection of alternatives elsewhere. <br /> Approval of Account No. 489 was withheld in accordance aith the <br /> suggestion of the City Manager. <br /> City Attorney - Account No. 440 (pp. 30-31) <br /> (Councilman Barrett left at 2:30 p.m.) <br /> ' Mr. Fales noted that charges for proportional overhead of the office <br /> of the City Attorney are proposed to be billed to the Port 1n view <br /> of the increasing Port activity. <br /> (Councilman Barrett returned at 2•34 p.m.) <br /> Brief discussion followed concerning the arrangement between the <br /> Port and the City Attorney with regard to Charter requirements. <br /> • Account No. 440 was approved as submitted. � <br /> Personnel Administration - Account No. 461 (pp. 32-34) <br /> MOTION: Councilman Rhodes moved, seconded by Councilman Barrett <br /> for the purpose of discussion only, to eliminate the position of <br /> one of the two personnel analysts at a saving of the salary and <br /> salary related costs for that position. <br /> Mr. Fales advised that the person added to the sub3ect department <br /> is the Affirmative Action officer and that the City could expect <br /> to lose a11 federal dollars presently received as well as to be <br /> sued imnediately with regard to equal opportunity, if the position <br /> � of the officer is eliminated. In response to question, Mr. Fales <br /> advised that it would be impossible for the remaining personnel <br /> anatyst to assume the title of Affirmative Action officer and <br /> handle both �obs, particularly in view of the increase in arorkload <br /> -8- <br /> Budget Stuqy <br /> 5/8/76 <br /> � <br />