Laserfiche WebLink
��� V <br /> ` _ Account No 461 (continued) , <br /> for that person because of Ihc City'•, d�cision to bc�omc ti�lt- <br /> insured in workers compensdtion <br /> Discussion followed concernin9 the need of the City for the kind <br /> of work done by the second personnel analyst in meet�ng affirmative ' <br /> action requirements and the undesirability of permitting the courts <br /> to direct C�ty hiring because of City failure to attempt to meet <br /> affirmative action standards set by law. <br /> In response to question, Mr. Fales advised he will obtain statistics � <br /> on those hired with regard to the City's affirmative action pol9cy <br /> and also referred to Page 33 containing some of that information. r <br /> (memo 5/11/76) � <br /> The motion failed on the following roll call vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmen Biagi, Rhodes <br /> Noes. Councilman Barrett, Bury, Norris and Mayor Leipzig <br /> Account No. 461 was approved as submitted <br /> Public Service Training - Account No 462 (pp. 36-37) <br /> Mr. fales advised that the sub�ect account is funded by federal <br /> Revenue Shartng Funds <br /> In response to questions, Mr. Fales described the Public Service ' <br /> Training Program and its ob�ectives, observing that the scope is <br /> being reduced and will be confined to the Police and fire Depart- <br /> ments tn order to insure that it can be carrted out during 1976-77, <br /> since Revenue Sharing Funds may end at the end of 1976. Mr. Fales <br /> � advised that three persons participating in the Program have been <br /> � employed in regular positions in the City and several are now em- <br /> � ployed by other government �urisdictions and private industry. <br /> � Mayor Leipzig asked that approval of Account No. 462 be withheld <br /> ; until the Revenue Sharing sectton of the Budget is considered. <br /> , I, <br /> I � <br /> ; Municipal Building Services - Account No. 464 (pp. 38-39) <br /> I <br /> Mr. Fales advised that the increased budget is minimal as certain <br /> ; maintenance has been deferred in order to keep the budget down. <br /> i In response to question, Mr. Fales stated that the deferred main- <br /> i tenance would not greatly affect the conditions of City property. _ <br /> � Lengthy discussion followed and Mr. Fales and Mr Ference com- <br /> �� mented and replied to questions concerning the difficulties and <br /> various factors encountered in attempting to pro�ect salaries and <br /> �I' other costs on a long range basis rn spite of the desirability of <br /> i doing so <br /> ��� Account No. 464 was approved as submitted ' <br /> � <br /> I �� <br /> � <br /> �i -9- <br /> � � <br /> � Budget Study <br /> � 5/8/76 <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i ' Y <br /> '�. , � - <br />