Laserfiche WebLink
i • ° TM�sTIS. ' � ° � � <br /> , <br /> . 3 �7 3 <br /> Y � n� <br /> MOTION Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by Councilman Bury, <br /> to close the public hearing <br /> � <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote <br /> The public hearing was closed at 8 21 p m <br /> ' MOTION Title having been read, Councilman Bury introduced the <br /> following o"rdinance and moved, seconded by Councilman Norris, its <br /> approval for first reading � <br /> ORDINANCE RENUMBERING ARTICLE 23 (COMMENCING WITH THE HEADING i <br /> THEREOF) OF, AND ADDING ARTICLE 23 (COMMENCING WITH THE HEAD- I� <br /> ,. ING THEREOF) T0, ORDINANCE NO 1130, THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING <br /> ORDINANCE, PROVIDING fOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PF PUBLIC <br /> } FACILITIES ZONING DISTRICTS <br /> �' L � <br /> rc. The ordinance was approved for first reading on the following roll � <br /> ': call vote , <br /> Ayes Councilmen Barrett, Bury, Norris, Rhodes and Mayor <br /> Leipzig <br /> Noes Councilman Biagi <br /> Appeal from decision of Planning Co�mssion to <br /> a rove a lication b Stekoll Develo ment Cor oration <br /> 714 Canyon Road Robert F Cawley, 780 Bain Place, appellant) <br /> ' Mayor Leipzig advised that she will neither participate in the <br /> discussion nor vote with regard to the sub,7ect appeal as she lives <br /> in the neighborhood of the proposed development and has received <br /> a public notice of the appeal <br /> Mayor Leipzig turned the chair over to Vice Mayor Barrett and left <br /> the Council Chambers at 8 24 p.m <br /> Vice Mayor Barrett declared open at 8 25 p.m. the public hearing , <br /> � on the sub,7ect appeal �� <br /> City Clerk Hildebrand reported that the Affidavit of Publication V <br /> of Notice of Hearing is on file in her office and that no written <br /> i communications have been received + <br /> .,`t � <br /> �� City Manager Fales referred to the report of the Plam m �g Commis- <br /> '�' sion and the letter of May 6, 1976 of the City Attorney regarding , <br /> . the sub,7ect appeal <br /> A slide was pro,7ected on the screen depicting the proposed de- <br /> velopment for use as a reference i <br /> City Attorney Schr,•icker referred to his letter of May 6 regarding I <br /> the legal responsibilities and limitations of the Council pertain- � <br /> ing to the proposed subdivision and advising of the grounds upon � <br /> ' which a proposed subdivision may be denied. In response to ques- <br /> tions, Mr. Schricker advised that any conditional approval would have � <br /> to be supported with factual findings consistent with the grounds � <br /> described <br /> -4- <br /> Reg Mtg. <br /> 5/10/76 <br /> � <br />