Laserfiche WebLink
, � 38X <br /> Gar Yazalina, San'Mateo County Probation Department, who has worked <br /> wit Mr. Schenck and Thomas Delfs, Delinquency Prevention,Consultant, <br /> on the Program, described the Program, advising that about 40% of the <br /> referrals are expected to be from Redwood City and that qualitative <br /> and quantitive evaluations of the Program will be made. <br /> , Lengthy discussion followed and Mr Yazalina and Mr. Fales cortonented <br /> and replied to quest�ons concerning the kind of counseling antici- <br /> pated; whether self-referrals will be possible; the means of pub- <br /> licizing the Program; whether taxpayers could afford not to share <br /> in the cost of a program of the type descr�bed; the proced�res with <br /> regard to �uvenile arrests, the desirability of coordinating any <br /> �uvenile program w�th the school district, how Program p,articipants <br /> will be selected and_their knowledge of the alternatives if they do <br /> not cooperate in the Program; and the funding of the Program after <br /> the three-year federal grant expires. - <br /> in response to question, Mr. Yazalina adv�sed that Chief Probation <br /> Officer Loren Buckley has committed funds from his budget to the <br /> Program in the expectation of not needing the funds in other areas, <br /> if the Program is successful, when the federal funds expire. _ <br /> Councilman Barrett,'representative on the Crim�nal Justice Council� <br /> advised that the Program is of a type that will probably become State <br /> mandated soon as part of an attempt to keep �uveniles out of the �ail <br /> system and divert them from crime. , <br /> MOTION: Councilman,Norris moved, seconded by Councilman Bury, that <br /> $5,330 be approved for the Police Department Budget for 1976-77 for <br /> the South San Mateo County Delinquency Diversion and Prevention <br /> � Program. � <br /> Aurora Ramirez, 1620 Alameda, stated she wished to describe,certain <br /> problems encountered w�th the Police Department. Mayor Leipzig <br /> noted that Miss Ramirez' remarks were not addressed to the motion <br /> before Council and invited her to speak later at the appropriate <br /> time. , <br /> � - <br /> In response to question, Mr. Vazalina advised that a periodic evalu- <br /> ation of the Program would be provided on a quarterly and annual . <br /> basts. - , <br /> �. • , <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. ,� <br /> (MINUTE ORDER'N0. 76-133) <br /> In response to questions regarding the possibility of using a public <br /> service off�cer system to lower the costs of mainta9ning th`e Police <br /> Department, Mr. Fales advised that jurisdictions using such officers <br /> had var,ying degrees of success, noting that a sworn officer must re- <br /> spond to calls in order to determine what �s necessary, but that the <br /> public service officer might handle the paperwork. Mr. Fales advised <br /> that use of such officers is often recortonended in the belief, that <br /> increased visibility,of the police would make a`difference in the ' <br /> crime rate, but valid and reliable tests indicate�visibility made <br /> no difference in the crime rate. � <br /> � Police Chief Bold observed that a scientific study made in Kansas <br /> City confirms the�statement of Mr. Fales that simple visibility of <br /> police is not a'deterrent to crime, but that saturation patrol of ; <br /> ., _ <br /> , , � � Budget Study <br /> , , � 5/15/76 <br /> � �� <br />