Laserfiche WebLink
41�4'�'w . <br /> James Street across Southern Pacific rights of way, which he mis- <br /> understood was to be contracted to an outside firm. It was explained <br /> that these items are charged back to the department and costs of a <br /> pro�ect include an allocation for engineering design and is in-house, <br /> not contracted out <br /> Pro�ects listed under the Water program were reviewed by Mr. Fales ' <br /> and briefly discussed Storm Dratns pro,7ects were surrmiarized, and <br /> Mr Fales commented on the Federal Flood Insurance requirements as <br /> they relate to the Cardilleras Creek pro�ect Mr. Fales noted the <br /> deta�led report prepared by the Director of Public Works and submitted <br /> earlier to Council on the Sewage System <br /> Discussion followed concerning revenues and alternate sources for <br /> additional funds <br /> MOTION Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, that <br /> none of the three suggested sources of revenue (Adm�ssions Tax, Real <br /> Property Conveyance Tax, Ut�lity Users Tax) be adopted by the Council <br /> this year ` - <br /> MOTION WITHDRAWN Followin9 brief dtscussion, Councilman Norris, <br /> with the consent of his second, withdrew his motion <br /> Discussion continued regarding the eventual necessity of imposing <br /> the Admissions Tax <br /> MOTION Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, that <br /> a Utility Users Tax not be considered this year as a revenue source <br /> to offset the General Fund deficit <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote , <br /> (MINUTE ORDER N0. 76-149) <br /> MOTION. Councilman Norrts moved, seconded by Councilman Rhodes, that <br /> an Admissions Tax not be applied this year. <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> (MINUTE ORDER N0. 76-150) <br /> MOTION Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, that <br /> the Real Property Conveyance Tax not be imposed this year. <br /> Mr Fales commented and responded to questions by Council, indicating <br /> that the tax would be ins�gnificant, and would approximate, as an <br /> example, about $3 00 per thousand on a$100,000 house, and would <br /> apply only in the event of transfer of ownership Homeowners who <br /> retain ownership all their lives would, of course, never have to <br /> pay the tax. During the discussion which followed, there was some <br /> opposition to the tax expressed <br /> MOTION WITHDRAWN Councilman Norris, with the consent of his second, <br /> withdrew the motion <br /> Discussion contrnued, with indications of approval by Council of a ' <br /> Property Transfer Tax if it is used to reduce the tax rate. <br /> � � <br /> -4- <br /> Budget Study , <br /> 5/25/76 <br />