Laserfiche WebLink
� f25� <br /> 3. Liquefaction The last sentence in the second paragraph <br /> on page F-16 should be improved by being reworded as <br /> follows "Extensive testing for this factor has been <br /> carried out in Redwood Peninsula and Bair Island since <br /> 1965, and it can be concluded that soils materials there <br /> , should remain stable under conditions of strong seismic <br /> shaking and that the occurrence of liquefaction is <br /> highly unlikely " <br /> u 4. Pages F-14 through F-17 were meant to be illustrative <br /> examples pointing the direction toward the accompltsh- <br /> ment of the second and third specific goals listed on <br /> page F-13 The contents of the illustrative examples, <br /> taken by themselves, will not stand up under scrutiny. <br /> For example, the map on page F-17 represents the "seismic <br /> intensity and level of hazard" for a single occurrence <br /> of the same magnitude and at the same epicenter as the <br /> 1906 San Francisco earthquake. This certainly does not <br /> cover the field sufficiently to evaluate the "level of <br /> hazard" from seismtc occurrences in a responsible manner. <br /> Since the examples are so easy to misinterpret, and since <br /> it would be virtually impossible to label them so that <br /> they wouldn't be misconstrued by someone, pages F-14 <br /> through F-17 should be removed at this time, along with <br /> the parenthetical references to them on page F-13, to be <br /> replaced at some future time with the actual products <br /> called for in the two specific proposals mentioned on <br /> page F-13. <br /> � The motion carried unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> In response to question, City Attorney Schricker advised that <br /> Chapter V. of the Plan may be referred to staff for additional in- <br /> formation at this time and adopted later, but will remain part of <br /> the public hearing process which has taken place on the Plan. <br /> MOTION• Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by Councilman Leipzig, <br /> � that Chapter V. entitled "Economic and Fiscal Implications of the <br /> General Plan" be removed from the proposed General Plan for con- <br /> sideration at this time and be referred to staff for further review <br /> and presentation to Council at a future date <br /> The motion carried unanimously by roll call vote <br /> MOTION Councilman Williams moved, seconded by Counctlman Barrett, <br /> that in Section D. Open Space Element, page D-16 under "5 Proposals", <br /> item g"Leave Stulsaft Park, as much as possible, in its natural <br /> state" be deleted <br /> ADDITION TO MOTION Councilman Williams, with the consent of h�s <br /> second, added that on page D-17 in the item relating to Stulsaft <br /> Park, "leave natural" be stricken, and "study" used in its place <br /> The motion with the addition carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> ' MOTION Councilman Barret moved, seconded by Councilman Williams, <br /> that in Section C Housing Element, page C-4 in line 8 of para- <br /> graph a, delete "in the private sector." <br /> -3- <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 1/19/76 <br />