My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIIN 1976
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
CC MIIN 1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2011 4:47:43 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 4:47:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/5/1976
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 1 <br /> ��. �. <br /> Discussion followed concerning the desire of Council to keep <br /> the tax rate down; the evaluation made by Council at the <br /> time positions were eliminated, and the Budget Study Session <br /> procedure. � <br /> ' In response to statement by Mr. Margolies that he was not <br /> given a fair opportunity to speak against elimination of the <br /> =< Clerk Typist II position because he arrived at the session <br /> when consideration of it was �ust ending, Mr. Fales stated <br /> for the record that if Mr. Magolies has someth�ng to say <br /> with regard to the ethics of the conduct of the Budget Study <br /> Session that he should put his remarks in writing and give <br /> them to the City Clerk for transm�ttal to Council. <br /> Dave Cacciaroni firefighter (see above), stated he might <br /> have made more objection to the elimination of the Clerk <br /> pos�tion had he known the Admimstrative Assistant to be <br /> eliminated would be the one assigned to the Fire Department. <br /> Real Estate Conveyance Tax ' <br /> 1 <br /> Penelo e Tomlinson, President, Redwood City-San Carlos- <br /> Be mont Boar of Realtors, referred to her letter of June 18, <br /> 1976 protesting the �mplementation of a real property con- <br /> veyance tax Mrs. Tomlinson urged citizens be permitted to <br /> vote on whether they favor an increase in property tax or <br /> the conveyance tax. Mr. Fales expla�ned that the proposed <br /> tax is $3.30 per $1;000 payable on the transact�on once, <br /> ' wh�le a property tax of the amount needed to raise the <br /> same revenue would be an add�tional 6�-,¢ on the tax rate <br /> pdyable annually by everyone in the City. <br /> Discussion followed concerning the need for general tax re- <br /> form, the sources of revenue available to municipalities; <br /> the "buy-in" nature of the real estate conveyance,tax in <br /> recognition of the intention of the purchaser to use fac�li- <br /> ties already provided by the City, and whether or not the <br /> proposed tax is rtare or less equitable than other forms of <br /> taxation. • <br /> Stan S�lverstein realtor, suggested much of the opposition � <br /> to taxation results from the unfairness of certain types of <br /> taxes, noting that the proposed tax will cut into the equity <br /> of the seller of a home. It was explained that the tax is <br /> aimed at the buyer, although it was acknowledged that if <br /> the seller were to pay it, the tax would have to be included <br /> in the purchase price. <br /> Lengthy discussion continued regarding the equtty of various <br /> types of taxation, whether or not it is not preferable to <br /> have a conveyance tax patd once involving only the buyer and <br /> seller of property rather than an increased property tax <br /> paid annually by all residents, the desirability of realtors <br /> , participating in attempts to obtain tax reform, the lack of <br /> space for development of industrial property in the City, <br /> and the lack of negative influence of the conveyance tax in <br /> cities where it already exists. � <br /> -5- , <br /> Reg Mtg. � <br /> 6/21/76 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.