Laserfiche WebLink
"489 <br /> MARGUERITE LEIPZIG, MAYOR �Q�u ������� <br /> MICJ-IAEL J. BARRETT, VICE MAY� RUUnOO� <br /> COI,NCILhEN /��: �h■ Balltornla C I TY COUNC I L <br /> MARIO BIAGI , Y��� fOtl008AlYW AND � <br /> ROBERT H. BLRY _ PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br /> COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES BLDG. <br /> BOB NORFtIS 1400 ROOSEVELT AVENUE <br /> ' BILL RFIODES i JULY 26, I 976 4:00 P.M. <br /> FERNANDO VEGA <br /> �' Ad�ourned Meeting <br /> � <br /> The Council of the City of Redwood City met on this date at 4 00 p m <br /> in an ad,7ourned meeting from July 22, 1976, with Comnissioner Pound <br /> presiding over a �oint meeting with the Park and Recreation Commission <br /> Roll Call <br /> Councilmen present• Barrett, Biagi, Bury, Rhodes, Vega and Mayor Letpzig <br /> Councilmen absent Norr�s <br /> Park and Recreation Commissioners present Aldrich (arrived at 4 10 p m.), <br /> Buckhout, Knecht, Pound, Rollins, Schlesinger, <br /> Weintraub (arrived at 4 23 p.m ) <br /> Commissioners absent None <br /> Officials and staff present City Manager Fales, City Attorney Schricker, <br /> � Assistant City Manager Smtth, Director of Parks and Recreation Weeks, and <br /> Deputy City Clerk Reggetts <br /> Role of Commission <br /> Comm ssioner Pound referred to the dtscussion outline, which listed <br /> examples of the Park and Recreation positions on several matters, i e, <br /> Proposition D, Mid-Peninsula Regional Park District, on their continued <br /> �, support of District ob�ectives in light of Council's intention to de-annex, <br /> whether the Cortmiission's position in support or oppositton to legislation <br /> should be advisory to Council or whether the Commission may participate <br /> with Council direction, and Council's position regarding individual <br /> commissioners taking adversary roles Commissioner Pound indicated that the <br /> Commission is requesting clarification as to Council reaction to those <br /> positions, and what is expected of the Commission. <br /> In the response by Council, it was noted that the present position of Council <br /> opposing annexation to the District was based in part on observations that <br /> benefit to the cities which have been in the District since its inception <br /> do not seem to be sufficient to �ustify the costs, as well as on the basis <br /> of Council's arduous efforts during the budget study sessions to keep the <br /> property tax down. It was recognized that the Commission's initial <br /> position in support of the measure was taken well before the budget meetings <br /> , Discussion continued relating to the advisory function of the Park and <br /> Recreation Commission, and the concern of Council that the Commission should <br /> make its recommendations to Council in order that a unified position could <br /> be achieved with regard to any particular legislation <br /> Joint Mtg <br /> w/Park & Rec <br /> 7/26/76 <br />