Laserfiche WebLink
2,� 4 � <br /> owners and businesses of the proposed addition of a third lane, <br /> southbound between Harrison Avenue and Jackson Avenue, thereby <br /> eliminating two parking spaces. Mr Fales also referred to his <br /> report of February 6, 1976 attaching report of the Director of <br /> Public Works, dated February 5, and the report of the Traffic <br /> Engineer, dated February 4 , <br /> Director of Public Works Pusich reported the results of the <br /> attempts of his office to contact those affected, noting that <br /> A& W appears to have adequate off-street parking, that Anderson's <br /> TV and Appliance Shop supports the pro�ect as proposed; that Benz <br /> Delicatessen has not been open and it has been impossible to con- <br /> tact the owners, and that the owner of E1 Matador Restaurant be- <br /> lieves that the loss of two on-street parking places would cause <br /> him to be forced out of business. <br /> In response to request for �ustification of elimination of the two <br /> parking spaces, Mr. Pusich advised that the State believes its <br /> concerns about the intersection involved will be relieved by the <br /> proposed added traffic lane and observed that the State will re- <br /> view the matter following the trial period and might then be <br /> willing to restore the parking places, depending upon experience. <br /> Mr. Pusich also advised that several intersections were reviewed <br /> with the State, and the City's recortonendations were accepted for <br /> all others, with final CALTRANS approval contingent upon two <br /> changes, one of which involves the eltmination of two parking <br /> spaces. Mr. Fales confirmed Mr. Pusich's statements. <br /> Discussion followed and Mr. Fales and Mr. Pusich commented and <br /> replied to questions concerning changes which might occur fol- <br /> lowing the 18-month trial period; the State approval required in ' <br /> order to insure receipt of the approximately three million dollars <br /> in funds controlled by the State for the E1 Camino Real Pro�ect, <br /> whether bicycle lanes will be affected; whether the loss of two <br /> parking spaces will have any sign�ficant affect on business in <br /> the area; the success of the Downtown Pro�ect in spite of the <br /> loss of some parking spaces; and the desirability of adequate <br /> off-street parking for certain business operations. <br /> MOTION Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by Councilman Leipzig, <br /> to accept the two recormnendations of the State with regard to the <br /> E1 Camino Real Pro,7ect, involving the Whipple intersection and <br /> the section of E1 Camino Real between Harrison and Jackson Streets, <br /> for the purpose of obtaining State controlled funding of the <br /> Project. <br /> The motion carried by ma�ority voice vote. Mayor Weymouth re- <br /> quested that the "No" vote of Councilman Rhodes be recorded. <br /> (MINUTE ORDER N0. 76-47) <br /> Com rehensive Em lo ment Trainin Act <br /> CETA Title VI <br /> City Manager Fales referred to his report of February 19, 1976 <br /> regarding the agreement with the Bay Area Urban League for ad- ' <br /> ministration of the sub�ect Act. <br /> -6- <br /> Reg Mtg. <br /> 2/23/76 <br /> .r <br />