Laserfiche WebLink
CWM:djm 03/28/90 RD-7/27) <br /> <br /> evaluated during construction. The conclusion of <br /> <br />-_ the several experts engaged to make the <br /> evaluations of toxins for the EIR, which <br /> conclusion has not been challenged, is that an <br /> appropriate combination of the remedial measures <br /> set forth in the Final EIR would adequately <br /> address all known toxin problems found on the <br /> site. The most cost effective and functional <br /> remedial actions for the indicated soil and ground <br /> water contamination should be selected, subject to <br /> the approval of the Executive Director, and the <br /> remediation program should be coordinated with <br /> construction activities. <br /> <br /> d. Mitigation Monitoring Responsibility. <br /> <br /> Responsibility for monitoring the mitigation <br /> measures ultimately employed is assigned to the <br /> Developer; and the Developer shall report to the <br /> County Environmental Health Department and other <br /> responsible agencies, regarding volatile organic <br /> concentrations in the ground water. Such <br /> reporting will end when hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> are consistently below regulatory standards. Bay <br /> Area Air Quality Management District requirements <br /> shall be observed. <br /> <br /> 10. WETLANDS (Biotic Resources). <br /> <br /> a. Significant Effects. The Project would result in <br /> loss of 0.5 acres of stream channel habitat and a <br /> limited amount of riparian vegetation. <br /> <br /> 14 <br /> <br /> Kb qo-o <br /> <br /> <br />