Laserfiche WebLink
CWM:djm 03/28/90 RD-7/27) <br /> <br /> residential uses. This alternative has been <br />~_ demonstrated to be economically infeasible and should <br /> not be adopted. <br /> The General Plan designation for the site is <br /> commercial and employment and the zoning designator is <br /> General Commercial and Central Business. The General <br /> Plan has separated Commercial and Residential uses to <br /> the greatest extent possible to minimize adverse <br /> effects such as exposure to unacceptable noise levels. <br /> Although these noise levels could be mitigated to some <br /> extent the limited benefits outlined in Chapter 6 of <br /> the Final EIR to be achieved by this alternative do not <br /> justify the loss in economic value brought about by the <br /> reduced scope of the Project. <br />-- 3. THE OPEN CREEK ALTERNATIVE. <br /> The Open Creek Alternative would result in <br /> preserving and restoring the portion of Redwood Creek <br /> which runs through the site, but the constraints of the <br /> site would result in four two-story buildings instead <br /> of the four one-story and two two-story buildings that <br /> would be constructed under the proposed project. While <br /> this alternative contains the same square footage as <br /> the proposed project, it would not be an economically <br /> viable alternative. This alternative contains almost <br /> three times as much second story space as the proposed <br /> project (approximately 57,276 square feet of second <br /> story space compared with 21,012 square feet of second <br /> story space under the proposed project). The primary <br /> 18 <br /> <br /> <br />