Laserfiche WebLink
CWM:djm 03/28/90 RD-7/27) <br /> <br /> 1. THE NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. <br />_ This Alternative consists of leaving the site as <br /> it is in its blighted condition. While most <br /> significant adverse effects identified in the Final EIR <br /> would be eliminated by this Alternative, the overriding <br /> considerations of achievement of the goals of the <br /> General Plan, job creation and community beautification <br /> outweigh the adverse effects set forth in the Final <br /> EIR. <br /> The one adverse effect on the environment that <br /> would be more significant under the No Project <br /> Alternative than under the proposed project has to do <br /> with clean-up of toxins presently in the soil at the <br /> Project site. Without this Project, there is no <br />- telling when or by whom such clean-up would occur. <br /> This alternative is, therefore, infeasible and <br /> undesirable because it would also preclude attainment <br /> of several express objectives of the Community <br /> Redevelopment Law. The avoidance of limited negative <br /> effects is not justified by the loss of the beneficial <br /> impacts on the environment identified in the Final EIR <br /> that would be realized as a result of the Project, most <br /> important of which is the removal of toxins from the <br /> site. <br /> 2. THE RESIDENTIAL/RETAIL ALTERNATIVE. <br /> Under this alternative, 20,214 square feet of <br /> office/service and retail uses proposed on the second <br /> floor of buildings "D" and "E" would be replaced with <br /> 17 <br /> <br /> <br />