My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res90 RD-90-04
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Redevelopment
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Res90 RD-90-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:59:13 PM
Creation date
10/6/2003 12:51:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
Redevelopment
Date
4/9/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CWM:djm 03/28/90 RD-7/27) <br /> <br /> by the person responsible for the excavation. <br /> If remains are Native American the Coroner <br /> has 24 hours to notify the Native American <br /> Heritage Commission. <br /> 2. Any artifacts discovered during excavation <br /> <br /> shall be handled by a qualified archaeologist <br /> and turned over immediately to a government <br /> agency, to insure that they will be made <br /> available for public display. <br /> <br /> c. Rationale and Facts Supporting Findings. There <br /> <br /> is little likelihood that cultural resources will <br /> be found on the Project Site but it is appropriate <br /> to provide a mechanism for their proper <br /> disposition in the event that a discovery should <br /> occur. The mitigations outlined in the findings <br /> are appropriate and acceptable to the Native <br /> American Heritage Commission. <br /> <br /> d. Mitigation Monitoring Responsibility. <br /> <br /> Responsibility for mitigation monitoring shall be <br /> with the Planning Commission, the Redevelopment <br /> Director, and the Developer, which shall consider <br /> <br /> the use of Observer's Permits during actual <br /> <br /> excavation. <br /> <br />B. INFEASIBILITY OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br /> The following three Alternatives to the project described in <br /> <br />the Final EIR, which would reduce or avoid significant <br />environmental impacts and which are not included as part of the <br />project, are infeasible for the following reasons: <br /> <br /> 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.