My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1945
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1945 (partial)
>
Minutes 1945
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2017 9:47:29 AM
Creation date
8/10/2011 3:38:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/21/1945
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� . � <br /> e7 � <br /> � <br /> Councilman Granger reported that there wae no report from the sign committee and <br /> asked that the matter either be placed on the a.ger_da for the next meeting or <br /> tabled until such time as a report is av211ab1e. It i=ase agreed to table the <br /> ' matter until such time as the committee can briilg in a report. <br /> City b4�nager I��iead advised that a report h�,d been received from the Traf.fic Study <br /> Committee in re�ard to unlimited pArking 7.one in front of 719 Minslo�� 5treet <br /> and asked that it be placed on the agenda for the next meeting. Councilman <br /> ' Britschgi asked in regard to loadin6 zone vrhether or not the Purity Store on <br /> Iviarshall Street could not be a.sked to load from their own narking lot. At <br /> present they are loading in front of their store and obstructin� tra£°ic. City <br /> P�Ianaber Pdead advised he vrould contact them a.nd aek them to unload or load from <br /> their oim parking lot. Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilman <br /> L�cNulty;. that the matter of a loading zone at 719 Winelow 5treet be carried on <br /> • the agenda,for a report from the Traffic Stuc'�y Committee. P.Rotion passed unani- <br /> mously. <br /> City Manager Pdead reported on the condition of the sidewalks on Avondale .4venue and <br /> adjacent territory. He presented a map oP the area v��ith legend showin�Z the con- <br /> dition of the sidecral�ts. City Attorney r?cGarthy advised that the proper proce- <br /> dure to follow r�ould e to adopt a resolution of intenti.on requirin� the building <br /> ' of sider�alks where there are none and the repairin� of �iciewallcs where they are <br /> defective. Councilman Crranger believed the pronerty or✓ners "should be notified <br /> of the city�s intention before adonting the resolution. Councilm�.n Armstrong <br /> moved that the proper city officials be instructed to senr'. a communication to <br /> the property oti•mers in the area outlined on the map notifying them that their <br /> sidecralk is in an unsatisfectory condition or tha,t there is no side.�alk and if the <br /> condition is not remedied the Council intendc to taY,e action to rep�ir the eide- <br /> raalk or put in ne�e ones at their exroense. Councilman Anderson seconded the mo- _. <br /> • tion if there were included that the sidewal.�a must comp7y v:�ith cit,y snecifications: <br /> - Councilmzn Armetrong accepted the amendment. Councilm�n r:'cNulty vras of the opinion <br /> th�.t only the sidewal.ks whieh �vere defective should be repaired_ ��� tha.t neR eide- <br /> �valks should not be required in vrhich opinion Councilman C,ran�er concurred:. City <br /> Attorney �IcCarthy advised thzt under the act governing such proceedings the street <br /> ' superintendent is permitted to do the work �nd not let a contract. The proceedings <br /> are the same in all other respects. The motion passed saith Councilman Gran�er <br /> voting in the negative °or the reason that he not believe the same letter should <br /> be vmitten to all the property ovrners in the area and that only the complaint should <br /> ' be remedied at this time. <br /> The introduction of the 19�+5-�6 szlary ordinance wa.a next brou6ht uo for d�scussion. <br /> Counr7_lman Anderson moved introduction oP the ordinance, seconded by Gouncilman <br /> Britsehgi. Under the question, Councilman Cr�anger opposed the ordinance, be- <br /> • _ <br /> \ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.