Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> 6.9 <br /> • <br /> Communication was received from Michael Counihan protestin� payin� garba�e <br /> „ fee in advance. City ,Menr��er Mead advised that all garba�e bills are <br /> paid in advance and that Mr. Counihan was not being discrininstod against. <br /> ' CounciLnan P:IcNulty moved, seconded by Cotzncilmen Fletcher, thst a latter <br /> be addressed to tdr. Counihan advising that he was not being discrir�inated <br /> against es that was the rule f or all garbaga bills. Motion passod unani- <br /> mously. <br /> , Communication was received from J. R. Fogal regarding taxes on 25 foot lot. <br /> . City Man�ger MeAd advised that this matter had beon b efore tho Councll <br /> sometime ago and that the c�ouncil directod that action be taken to see if <br /> the lot could be sold to ad�oining property ownars. These owners had not <br /> made a reasonable offer and ;v]r. Fogal had been so advised and also advised <br /> that the citp could d o nothing further in the matter. Councilrian Arrlerson <br /> • exprossed the opinion that ir�smuch as Tdr. FogA1 had originally purchased <br /> the lot in a tax sale he did not fee that the city Kas obligatc�d in any wap. <br /> Councilman Armstror� moved tha�t �the City Clerk be instructed to advise Mr. <br /> Fogal that the City Council is viithout authority to cancel taxos or rofund <br /> any money on this lot. The motion was secondod by �ouncilnan Grangor and <br /> passed unanimously. � <br /> Coyununication was received from Nelle L. Miramontes, City Tax �ollector, advising <br /> '. that the roal estate committee had approved tho sale of certain lots by Ssn <br /> Mateo Cour.ty and that tt�e sale price did not meet all the deli�}quent bonds. <br /> She esked that the Council cancel the sum of ?�672.64 on N.E. 1/4 of I'.ot 5, <br /> Elocic 11, Oek Knoll Manor on Bond Series F and the sum of �p131.95 be can- <br /> celled on Lots 6, 7, Block 11, S:veeney�s Addition on IIond Serios I. Council- <br /> man Fletcher,nmoved, secondad by Councilman Anderson, that the above amounts <br /> be cancellad on these lots. Motion passed unanimously. <br /> • Communication was roceived from F. Pi. Ho�g edvising that in ordor to put road <br /> through lmoperty formerly owned by ?dr. rAunson he needs Lots 8 and 9 of Alock <br /> 1 of Redwood Oaks. He advised that he had been able to buy Lot 9, but that <br /> the owner of Lot 8 was asking an out-of-the-question pr1Ee for Lot 8 and <br /> said that he �vould pay it if' neceasary but asited that the cit3 institute an <br /> ' eminent domain auit to acquire this lot for the 'r.oad to be openec7. He advised <br /> that he was puttin� up �400.00 in the Peninsula Title �Comp�r►y to guarantee that <br /> he will pay the amount for the lot if nocassary. City pttorney 1,icCarthy ed- <br /> vised this would be a proper procedure but he believed the �400.00 guarantee s <br /> should b e placad with the city rathar than the title company. IIe hed prepared <br /> ' the necessary resolution to proceed with the condemnation proceedings. Mr. <br /> Hogg agreed to deposit�the money with the city. Councilman Anderson offered <br /> ,• <br /> \ <br />