Minutes 1946 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

. - cy -g � ABSENT: Councilmen: ANDER90N. G � g C • ,_ RALPH, DODGE City Clerk APPROVED: . :, ,, W, W. HILTON I � Mayor of tne dity of Redwood City � Councilman Britschgi entered the meeting. City Manager Hlom advised that a�Mr. flfilliame who o9vne property on West Union Road outside the iimits oY the aity ]ia.d lnquired about the poesioility of �� connecting sewers to the city aewer eystem and to obtain wa.ter service in : this area. It wae disoovered that some years ago, in 1927, the Council had agreed to let him connect to the city sewere and to furnieh water service. It did not etate in the minutes of the meeting in April, 1927, whether the a�reement wae to cover one home or more, City Mana.ger Blom aeked Council- ' man MeNulty if he recalled tne agreement, Councilman McNulty did so but C wae unable to say whether the agreement covered an individual home or sev- eral homes. Mr. 9Pilliams adviaed that he contemplated building seventeen homes in this area. It wae the general conaeneus of the Council that Mr, Williame ehould petition to come into the city limite inasmuch ae it wa,s believed that the city wae not in a position to offer exteneion of aervicee .;._.. , outside the city limite. Due to tne fact that Mr. Williame had not taken � advantage of the agreement entered into in 1927 up to this time, the Coun- n cil did not feel that it was obligated to etand by thie agreement, Coun- ■ cilman Fletcher moved, eeconded by Councilman Armstrong, that due to the : fact that the citq eewers are overloaded and the property in question ie ,outaide the city limits, the request of Mr, Williams be denied, Motion paesed.unanimously, Mr. Ingeraoll explained triat the amendment to Ordinance No. 515 pzovided for a new section, Ae stated that tne 1913 8tate Aqt had proven cumbersome in � recent yeare $ nd that in 1941 it veas amende&tto;°�provide that where 85�6 of property ownere within a proposed improvement district petitioned the governing body to go ahead with the work that the inveatigation proceedings could be dispeneed with, The proposed amendment to the ordinanoe, he said, . �complies witn the pronision in the 8tate Act, Councilman Britscngi asked. �I if tais provision would eliminate the resolution of preliminary intention �� to which Mr, Ingereoll replied that it did upon petition of 85�6 oY the affected property ownera, Cotmcilman Armstrong asked if the method was nmt an alternate procedure and did not supersede Ordinance No. 515, City Attor- .ney McCarthy agreed this wae eo. Councilman Fletcher offered introduction: : of ordinance amending Ordinance No.� 515, seconded by Councilman Armstrong, ' Motion pa.ased unanimously, In regard to the amendment to Ordinance No. 333, Mr, Ingeraoll eltsborated on the remarks made by Mr, i�ilson';at the last meeting of the Council. He explained the prooedure followed after tne resolution of intention ie adopted fo2' pub- j C . lic improvements and which provides for selling bonds before tne contract ie �. - ',, \