Laserfiche WebLink
, ..... : _ : .. 419 <br /> directed to prepare plans and,specificationa for the construction.of saifl <br /> � eanitary sewer,.,. . - <br /> The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and ado�ted�by the Coun- <br /> cil of the City of Reddaood City at a regular meeting thereof held on the <br /> 15th day of_ 1946 by the following vot _ <br /> AYEB, and in favor of the passage and adoption of the foregoing Resolu- <br /> tion: Councilmen; ARI�STRONG, BRITSCHGI, GRANGER, McNULTY, SWIFT, WERDER <br /> and HILTON. <br /> ' NOES: Councilmen: NONE <br /> ABSENT: Councilmen: NONE <br /> Vl. W. HILTON <br /> bfiayor of the City oP Redwood Oity <br /> ATTEST: � <br /> I RALPH S. DODG� <br /> I hereby approve the foregoing Resolution <br /> this 15th day of July, 1946. - <br /> ' W, VY. AILTON <br /> Mayor of the City of Redwood Citq <br /> • City Attorney McCarthp presented an amendment to the plumbing code ordinance <br /> which perraits the use of galvanized iron pipe for firat floor v�astes, .This <br /> amendment is effective�until October 1, 1946, which time limit can be ex- <br /> tended by a 5/7ths vote of the Council. Councilman Granger offered intro- <br /> duction of ordinance amending the plumbing code ordinance, seconded by <br /> Councilman 3wift, Motion passed unanimously. City Attorney MeCarthy fuz- <br /> ther advised that the emergency provision had been included and the ordinance <br /> , would be effective August 5, 1946. <br /> City Attorney McCarthy advised that his attention had been called to the fact that <br /> a motion had been paeaed by the Council in March for an ordinance to be <br /> drafted to repeal an ordinance the Council had adopted in February prohib- <br /> . iting the keeping of chickene in the first residential dietrict. He atated <br /> he had overlooked preparing such an amendroent unt31 this time. He aleo pro- <br /> vided in the amendment pronisions for eliminating the keeping oY horses. <br /> � City Manager Blom advised that there is a conflict in the ordinance govern- <br /> ing the keeping of horses or cows, One ordinance provides for them to be <br /> kept 40 feet from adjoining swellings and another places a 100 foot limita- <br /> . tion for the ataking out or tping of a horse or cow. He further etated the <br /> present city ordinances were more liberal that the county ordinances for <br /> ' outslde the city limits. There was considerable diacuaeion, pro and con, as <br /> to wheLher the ordinance now in effect ahould be amended, Counoilman 4Verder <br /> and Councilman Armstrong both being of the opinion that chickens should not <br /> be raised in the first residential district. Councilman Armstrong moved, <br /> ,, seconded by Councilman Werder, that the matter be dropped from the agenda <br /> and the present ordinance remain in effect and adhered to. Councilman . <br /> Granger d1d not believe that was the ucishes of the previous Council and be- <br /> lieved they should be carried out. City Attorney �YcCarthy then outlined <br /> the hietory of all ordinances providing for the keeping of chickena and <br /> other animale since 1941. A Mr. Kimberly appeared and protested not being <br /> � able to keep chickens in the first residential district. A roll call note <br /> \ <br />