Laserfiche WebLink
, . _ 217 <br /> regular meeting thereof neld on the,, Day of Februa,ry, 1946, by the fol- <br /> � lowing vote: . = <br /> :'A YE3 and in favor of the passage and adoption of the foregoing resolu- <br /> tion: Councilmen: C. C, ARi�i9TRONG, C. A, BRITSCHGI, E, A. FLETCHER, F. D. <br /> GRANG�R, G, �d, hScIdUL2Y and 4Y. FY. HILTON. <br /> � NOES and against the passage and adoption of the foregoing Resolution: <br /> Councilmen: NONE. <br /> ' AB3ENT: Councilmen; H. F. ANDER50N <br /> W..W. HILTON <br /> Mayor of the G�ity of Redwood City. <br /> ATTEBT: <br /> ' R. S. DODGE ' <br /> Clerk of the City,of Redwood Cit� <br /> I hereby approve the Foregoing Resolution this 4th day of February, <br /> 1946. <br /> VJ, ir4, HILTON <br /> M�.yor of the City of Redwood Oity. <br /> � <br /> City Attorney McCarthy advised that he had prepared an ordinance repealing <br /> ordinance passed in 1942 which permitted the raising of chickena within <br /> twenty-five feet of a dwelling house. He also provided in the ordinance <br /> that no chickens or rabbits shall be raised in the first residento,l area. <br /> He advised that it is possible to postpone the effective date of an ordi- <br /> nance beyond the thirty day period after enactment, Councilman Armstrong <br /> , suogested the effective date be set at hBay 31, however, tlze majority of the <br /> Council �vas of tne opinion this was too far in advance and were in favor of <br /> setting it as April 30. Councilman Armstrong offered introduction of the <br /> ordinance repealing raising of chickens within 25 feet of a dwell'ing and <br /> prohibiting the raising of chickena.in the first residential district. The <br /> motion was seconded by Councilman Fletcher and passed unanimously. Included <br /> in the motion was the provision that the effective date of this ordinance <br /> • be set as April 30, 1946, <br /> City �danager Blom reported that in company with Build"ing Inspector Duncan and <br /> Mr, Clair Stilliman he inspected smoke nouses at Sunnyvale and San Jose. $e <br /> stated that neither of these smoke houses are"located near residences, how- <br /> ever, he believed that after inspecting these two smoke housea it would be <br /> ' possible to operate one v�ithout creating a nuisance to the adjoining area. <br /> It was riis opinion that it depende entirely on the manner in which it ia <br /> operated. It was h3s recommendation that if Mr. 8�illiman preeents a plan <br /> which meeta with the approval of the Building Inspector and the City Manager <br /> ne be granted the permit to operate a smoke house with the underetanding <br /> , tha.t the Health Department keep a close watch on the operation with the idea <br /> that at any time 'it ie objectionable it will be removed, Councilman Granger <br /> moved, seconded by Councilman Britschgi, tnat the permit be granted subject <br /> to trie plans of the smoke house being submitted to trie Building Inepector <br /> and that an agreement be signed by Mr. Silliman that he will remove the <br /> � smoke house if in the opinion of tne Building Inapector, Health Department <br /> \ <br />