My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1946
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1946 (partial)
>
Minutes 1946
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 4:43:02 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 4:42:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/7/1946
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� .. . , . 265 <br /> • paying for the line beyond that distance. Refunde of an agreed amount are <br /> made as �,dditional connections are made to the line. <br /> A study of the systems followed by other cities on the Peninsula.had been <br /> made and also a report which had been published in a water works raagazine. <br /> �� Some of the cities are following the refund plan and others require the <br /> ' user to pay the full cost, There is no definite trend but it ia generally <br /> toward small refunds or no refunds at all, <br /> In Palo Alto,�the city installs'150 feet of main. The apAlicant paye in <br /> advance the estimated coet of footage required. The main is depreciated at' <br /> 3� a yea.r during the period of agreement and the balance remaining ie re- <br /> ' funded without interest at any time that the revenue from the water salea <br /> from that section of the water main in twelve consecutive months is equal <br /> to 20� of the total capital invested by the applicant who put in the main. <br /> . Agreements run for a maximum of fifteen years, No refund ie allowed unleas <br /> there is the 20%�revenue within a one year period, <br /> • In Burlingame, the subdivider pays the cost of the water system designed by <br /> the city, No refunds are granted of any kind. Burlingame requires a 6° <br /> main, The ueer pays �20 for meter setting and also the cost of the service <br /> • pipe running from the main into the street, <br /> In Hillaborougn, the subdivider pays the full cost of the system, Refunde <br /> are made when the revenue from the sale of water in twelve consecutive monthe <br /> equals 20�jo of the actual cost of installation. No refunds are made after <br /> , eight yeare, <br /> San Mateo does not ovJn its water syetem but operates under a privately owned <br /> , system, The company Mill inetall 100 feet of main free of charge for each <br /> service connection, Additional footage is paid for by applicant., Coet is <br /> estimated on a maximum of 4" pipe. Refunds are made on the cost of 100 feet <br /> of line for each new connection with a ten year limit on the agreement, This <br /> does not apply to subdivisione but only to individual usera. In subdivisions, <br /> the subdivider advances the total cost, the size and type of pipe determined <br /> • by the water company. Apolicant may choose revenue method of refund for a <br /> • period not exceeding ten years. Company will refund annua,lly 35% of the <br /> gross receipts from the consumer on the connection, not to exceed total cost <br /> of the installation. The other option is a proportionate cost agreement for <br /> . a period not exceeding ten years, the Company vrill refind to depositor the <br /> , cost of installation of 100 feet of main for each bona fide consumer. In <br /> � extensions to supply housing projecte, the applicant is required to elect the <br /> revenue.method. <br /> Our present policy provides that we cnarge $10 for a meter deposit. Tne <br /> ' actua.l cost of connecting consumers to the main in the street runs to �45 or <br /> $50, whicn is a great burden for the water department to absorb, <br /> � He asked that the Council establish a firm policy as to hotiv these extensio ns <br /> and services are to be financed, <br /> F Mr. Jonri McCarthy �,nd Mr. Ludwig 1'�erder appeared before the Council in regard <br /> • •to changing the system no�v in practice. Mr. McCarthy asked how it would af- <br /> fect those subdivisione already in effect. It was the general consensue of <br /> \ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.