My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 12:02:59 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/22/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1. G. - Page 39 <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Findinq #8 <br /> Confusion as to how governments categorized and interpreted what portion of <br /> fund balance was available for discretionary spending led to development of a <br /> new GASB 54 standard, effective for all financial statements after June 30, 2011, <br /> which provides more structure and clarity around constraints placed on fund <br /> balances. San Mateo County implemented GASB 54 early, with the new <br /> terminology reflected in its FY 2010 CAFR. No cities in San Mateo County <br /> implemented early. <br /> Response <br /> The City agrees with this finding in acknowledging that the new GASB 54 <br /> standard is in effect for all financial statements beginning after June 15, <br /> 2010. As a first step towards implementation of GASB 54 the City Council <br /> recently adopted at its June 27, 2011 Council Meeting the classification of <br /> certain amounts as "committed" pursuant to the new reporting <br /> requirements of GASB 54, along with delegating authority to the City <br /> Manager to "assign" amounts to be used for specific purposes. The City <br /> will be implementing GASB 54 with the issuance of the 2010-11 <br /> Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). <br /> Findinq #11 <br /> Ten participating cities are not making their full actuarially determined OPEB <br /> payments for retiree health care benefits, with three cities (Atherton, Brisbane, <br /> Foster City) having paid at /ess than an average of 25 percent for the last two <br /> years. <br /> Response <br /> The City disagrees with this finding as the City began fully funding its <br /> actuarially required contribution (ARC) in fiscal year 2009-10 with its <br /> payment of the full amount to the California Employer's Retiree Benefits <br /> Trust (CERBT). The City continues to make and budget for the full ARC <br /> payment in the most recently completed fiscal year 2010-11 and budget <br /> year 2011-12. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Recommendation A.1. <br /> The City Council, by July 1, 2012 should either revise the existing or implement a <br /> new policy for specific levels of reserves using language consistent with the new <br /> GASB Statement 54 hierarchy. <br /> a. Establish in the policy the required level of General Fund Balance <br /> for classifications that are spendable within the complete control of <br /> the government's local decision making authority. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.