Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.A. - Page 10 <br /> One Council Member noted that soliciting input from the community and stakeholders <br /> was already being done. And, in regards to term limits, the Council gets to vote people <br /> in and out, so this Council Member believed this was a more tacit way of having term <br /> limits. <br /> M/S Foust/Pierce to reject recommendation #7 but include item #5 which is already the <br /> norm. Motion carried 7-0 by electronic vote. MINUTE ORDER 11-102 <br /> Clarification on content related to the numeric items: <br /> 7. Adopt a term limit policy for all Council-appointed BCCs to ensure broad participation. <br /> 5. Solicit regular input from community groups and stakeholders to maintain broad <br /> perspective and diverse input on policy. Invite community members to participate on ad- <br /> hoc or issue-specific committees that are of interest to them. <br /> One Council Member noted that the ad hoc committees needed to be controlled and <br /> focused. This Council Member believed that the ad hoc committees could be hard to <br /> manage and may become problematic. It was strongly recommended that the <br /> handbook needed to clarify roles in regards to the members of the ad-hoc committees. <br /> One Council Member would like to have a regular process to review BCCs. This <br /> Council Member would like to find ways to evolve and change and come up with a <br /> process that includes regular review and assessment. <br /> M/S Seybert/Aguirre to enact a periodic review process (item #6) for each non charter <br /> and other standing committees. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> MINUTE ORDER 11-103 <br /> Clarification on content related to the numeric items: <br /> 6. Enact a sunset provision for all non-charter boards, commissions and committees to <br /> ensure advisory bodies are reviewed periodically, so they maximize the benefits they <br /> offer to the Council and the Community. <br /> Council discussed the value of reviewing the charge and merits of certain BCCs. One <br /> Council Member shared that the County of San Mateo reviewed its Boards, <br /> Commissions and Committees every 10-years, so it was advisable to have a formal <br /> process to enable change. One Council Member requested that the approach that was <br /> followed by the County be shared with the full Council. <br /> M/S Bain/Pierce to disband the Home Improvement Loan and have its functions moved <br /> to staff. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. MINUTE ORDER 11-104 <br /> Another Council Member would like to make a motion to have the Board of Building <br /> Review under the Planning Commission and retain the Civic Cultural as its own <br /> Commission. The City Attorney said that there could be some reasons why this would <br /> not so be advisable and she would research it and bring this back. The motion was <br /> withdrawn. <br /> M/S Foust/Seybert to place Architectural Review Committee (ARC) and Historic <br /> Resources Advisory Committee under the Planning Commission and have this body <br /> appoint the members. Council discussed the issue that three members on the ARC <br /> might be hard to manage due to conflicts of interest and the maker of the motion agreed <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD June 27, 2011 <br /> MEETING/BUDGET STUDY SESSION II MINUTES PAGE 10 <br />