Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 62 <br /> ATTACHN�NT 3 <br /> Ms. Ekas replied that is correct. The effect of the sunset clause would force reevaluation <br /> in two years whereas adopting the ban doesn't prohibit future amendment. <br /> Commissioner Bondonno asked that it doesn't preclude anything. <br /> Ms. Ekas replied yes. <br /> Mrs. Stevenson stated that if the sunset clause is not acted upon, the ban would expire. <br /> Commissioner Schmidt asked for a definition of expired. <br /> Mrs. Stevenson the proposed ban would end on the date of the sunset clause, and there <br /> would be no more regulation. That is the effect of the sunset clause, forcing the council <br /> to tinker with the article in the future. <br /> Chair Borgens asked for clarification that there would be no criteria established. <br /> Mrs. Stevenson replied that certain cities have decided that since the use is not defined <br /> in the zoning code, they don't recognize the use and they feel that not recognizing the <br /> use is enough to not accept the applications, but that is not the clearest way to go about <br /> the issue. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING <br /> Joel Garcia spoke against the ban on the medical marijuana dispensaries. He referred <br /> to the 1996 proposition 215, which more people vote for than voted for President Clinton. <br /> He noted that in the bay area peninsula the need of patients is not being met, with the <br /> delivery services being fairly new, and the option to grow your own cannabis not being <br /> viable for most patients. He cited a case in which administrative law judge Francis <br /> Young declared marijuana as one of the safest therapeutically active substances known <br /> to man. He cited the figures of how many people die yearly from legal recreational <br /> substances such as tobacco and alcohol. He stated that there are more violent incidents <br /> at clubs and bars than at cannabis dispensaries, and in neighborhoods in San Francisco <br /> and Oakland crime has decreased around cannabis dispensaries. <br /> Jonathan Steigman, Americans for Safe Access, spoke on behalf of patients who could <br /> not show up to the hearing because they are afraid of losing their jobs, apartments, and <br /> children. He stated there are no corollaries between cannabis dispensaries and crime, <br /> noting that convenience stores are robbed more frequently than dispensaries. He stated <br /> that the patients that are most concerning are low and fixed income, are homebound, or <br /> want to pick their medicine up personally rather than have it delivered because of the <br /> different strains of inedicine. He stated that there has not been a credible case of death <br /> as a result of cannabis during the ten thousand years it has been used, and he urged the <br /> commission to use science and reason rather than hysteria. Medical marijuana is used <br /> for physical disorders such as cancer and AIDS as well as psychological disorders such <br /> as ADD and PTSD. <br /> Josh Griffith Jr. spoke in favor of allowing the moratorium to expire. He stated the city <br /> could use the revenue from dispensaries to support city activities and events. He stated <br /> Page 10 of 16 <br />