Laserfiche WebLink
7. B. - Page 14 <br />Executive Summary <br />1! <br />GlIY <br />qW <br />`wflj(RG 9 6 e WJft LCr&d <br />Many of the City's pump stations are old. The City has embarked on a program to perform major <br />rehabilitation to its facilities, and it is recommended that this program continue into the future. <br />Major rehabilitation is recommended for three tanks: Carson Reservoir, Peninsula 1 Tank and <br />Peninsula 2 Tank. Eventual replacement of tanks will be required, but is anticipated beyond the <br />Master Plan timeframe. <br />Table ES -5. Summary of Recommended Facility Rehabilitation and Replacement <br />Programs <br />FRP -1 <br />Program includes highest priority pump station and tank <br />$3.3 <br />re- habilitation projects that are anticipated within the Master <br />Plan timeframe. Includes rehabilitation of Cambridge and <br />Carson pump stations, and replacement of Carson Reservoir <br />roof. <br />FRP -2 <br />Program continues the City's systematic pump station <br />$9.5 <br />rehabilitation program, including rehabilitation of Eagle Hill, <br />Edgewood, and Glenloch Pump Station. Also includes major <br />rehabilitation projects for Peninsula 1 and 2 Tanks (pile <br />upgrades, re -wrap Pen 2 Tank), and replacement of Wilmington <br />Tank which is vulnerable to seismic events. <br />FRP -3 <br />Program includes longer -term projects that are recommended <br />$47.8 <br />for implementation beyond the 20 -year CIP timeframe. Includes <br />rehabilitation of four pump stations and replacement of 11 tanks. <br />Total <br />$60.6 <br />ES.7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND FUNDING ANALYSIS (CHAPTER 8) <br />The projects described above comprise the components of the CIP. <br />Of the projects that were identified in the CIP, the projects required to mitigate existing system <br />deficiencies would be funded from rates. The projects required to meet future growth would be <br />funded through development impact fees and specific needs identified would be funded as <br />conditions of approval of new development. As part of the Master Plan, a funding analysis for <br />the rates portion of the CIP was prepared, evaluating three potential funding scenarios. <br />ES.7.1 Funding Analysis <br />Table ES -6 summarizes the total cost, in current dollars, of projects that are recommended for <br />implementation within and beyond the 20 -year CIP timeframe. The table also reflects the <br />funding analysis that resulted in three CIP scenarios: a baseline CIP (Scenario 1), and CIP that <br />improves risk management and system performance within the 20 -year Master Plan timeframe <br />(Scenario 2), and a fully- funded CIP that addresses all known capacity, operational, seismic and <br />aging infrastructure risks identified by the technical evaluations within the same timeframe <br />(Scenario 3). In addition, the analysis includes the cost of capital improvements that should be <br />completed in the future, to continue annual renewal and replacements beyond the CIP timeframe. <br />The priority and implementation schedule for these future projects will depend on many factors, <br />WEST Y O S T ASSOCIATES ES-10 City of Redwood City <br />September 2011 Water System Master Plan <br />o\c\369\06-09-01 \wp\mp\05261 0_0ES <br />