My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-11-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-11-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2011 4:40:35 PM
Creation date
11/10/2011 3:03:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
11/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.A. - Page 12 <br />been found at the site and he believes the geological reports are valid. Mr. Hanna also <br />explained that the term feasibility is well used and need not be defined. He then asked <br />Council to let the owners build responsibly. <br />Public Comment <br />Roger Flores read a statement regarding a structurally unsafe house that was over 60 <br />years old that was leveled and rebuilt, and in the last 20 years, this house is now livable <br />and substantial. He said that factual data was not submitted. <br />Arlene Flores was not present when called. <br />Kristi Guinon said they live at the bottom of Glenwood and requested the EIR <br />(Environmental Impact Report) be overturned. She referred to a letter they had sent to <br />the City Council on August 16 regarding their concerns and many questions about the <br />process, and opined that it is not acceptable to take a wait and see approach. <br />Larry Purcell, an almost 30 -year resident, spoke about legal nonconforming lot sizes, <br />the issue of putting a cap of the size of homes, easement issues, that there was a dirt <br />road that was never deeded to City, and each property owner owns the street in front of <br />it. He questioned the staff report, the inadequacy of addressing easement issues by the <br />developer over the years, and in the description of the lot sizes, the average sizes were <br />given and open space was included, but why was it included if the open space will not <br />be developed. <br />Martin Kamph, a resident at Laurel and Highland for 13 years, said there have been <br />problems with traffic, road conditions, and poor drainage all the way down the hill. He <br />opined that the road needs to be redone, repaved, a new project will create bigger <br />problems, and such large -scale proposals require a solution from neighbors, City staff, <br />and City Council. <br />Rick Guinon said he lives below the proposed project at Glenwood and spoke about the <br />need for floor area ratio guidelines, an EIR, and mitigation measures. He spoke against <br />the project and the need for a tree removal plan. <br />John Bamford lives on Glenwood Avenue at the bottom and he spoke in support of the <br />appeal to the EIR based on reasons presented by others that live in the Laurel Way <br />area. He spoke about landslide concerns and he addressed comments on letters <br />submitted to the City. <br />Carrie Simon said her aunt, Jane Hanigan was never part of the joint project, has lived <br />in her home for 44 years, and she is a part owner with her aunt. She spoke against the <br />project as oversized and incongruous for this environmentally fragile area and stated <br />specific concerns that fall under two CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) <br />categories. <br />Beverly Purrington said she has lived at Vista Drive for 15 years and spoke in support of <br />the appeal. She expressed concerns about deficiencies in the EIR, setting risky <br />precedents, long -term costs to the City and impacts to immediate neighbors. <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD August 22, 2011 <br />MEETING MINUTES PAGE 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.