My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-12-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-12-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2012 8:43:35 AM
Creation date
12/13/2011 2:08:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/12/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8. D. - Page 5 <br /> December 14, 2011 <br /> Mr. Thomas J. Umberg <br /> California High-Speed Rail Authority Board <br /> 770 L Street, Suite 800 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95814 <br /> Subject: Draft 2012 Business Plan Comments <br /> Dear Mr. Umberg: <br /> The City of Redwood City is pleased with the progress demonstrated in the Draft 2012 <br /> Business Plan; it is a vast improvement over the 2009 plan and we support the direction <br /> the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) is taking. You are to be commended <br /> for the quality and the depth of the business plan, as well as the improved <br /> responsiveness to the interests of local stakeholders. In particular, to see that the <br /> CHSRA has embraced the "blended approach" increases our confidence in the overall <br /> process and in the project. As advocates of this approach, we continue to believe that <br /> pursuit of this alternative is critical to garnering community support from Redwood City <br /> residents and businesses. <br /> We also support the following, as outlined in the draft plan: <br /> � Phased implementation — where new segments will be added as the need is <br /> identified and as funding becomes available <br /> � Advanced investment in local and regional rail — to improve existing infrastructure <br /> to facilitate "blended" services <br /> � Estimating ranges of ridership and cost — that are more likely to capture the <br /> actual ridership levels and costs <br /> � Reassessment of public and private funding — which demonstrates how the ICS <br /> will be funded with public sources, suggests how the IOS could be publicly <br /> funded, and identifies when and how private capital can be expected to <br /> contribute to the system <br /> In addition to the above, we have the following comments and suggestions for how to <br /> improve upon the draft business plan: <br /> � Do not assume that revenues increase at the same 3% inflation rate as costs, the <br /> more conservative assumption would be that costs increase at a faster rate than <br /> revenues. <br /> � Illustrate how local funding sources could fill the anticipated funding gap in 2021 <br /> and 2022 ($393M and $825M, respectively); it's difficult to comprehend how this <br /> gap might be filled with the types of potential sources that were listed (rent, cost- <br /> sharing agreements, etc. <br /> � Average airfare assumption seems low relative to costs today, when you can get <br /> a roundtrip ticket for �$110-$150. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.