Laserfiche WebLink
8. D. - Page 6 <br /> December 7, 2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Finally, the following comments are more stylistic in nature: <br /> � Exhibit 6-2. Add the DOF population estimate to the chart to illustrate how the <br /> business plan estimates compare with state projections. Also adjust the low <br /> forecast so that the 44.6M point in 2040 is below the 45M population line of the <br /> chart. <br /> � Break-even analysis should report the breakeven rate as the percentage of the <br /> planning (or low ridership estimates) scenario, not the high ridership scenario. <br /> � Consider using a stacked area chart to illustrate how ridership grows over time <br /> as the system is built out — this style would more clearly show the relative <br /> contributions of new segments opening and ridership growth from existing <br /> segments (in addition to or in lieu of Exhibit 6-11. Ridership, IOS-North first, <br /> through Full Phase 1). <br /> � Define TOC (p. 5-13) and replace references to P3 with PPP. <br /> � It is unclear why 2040 population estimates (p. 6-8) are used when the forecast <br /> year is reported to be 2030 (p. 6-4), similar mixing of projections and timelines on <br /> p. 6-12 — where the 49M population (2040 estimate) is cited at Full Phase 1— <br /> which is completed in 2034. If the reason 2040 is used is because it allows for <br /> the full ramp up post Phase 1 completion, state as much. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Alicia Aguirre <br /> Mayor, Redwood City <br /> C: Roelef van Ark, CEO CHSRA <br /> Michael Scanlon, Executive Director/CEO, Peninsula Joint Powers Authority <br /> City Council, Redwood City <br /> Bob Bell, City Manager <br /> Pamela Thompson, City Attorney <br /> Silvia Vonderlinden, City Clerk <br /> Bill Ekern, Director of Community Development <br />