Reso10 PC 10-01 June 29 2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

to the EII , on file and rude a vailable at the Department of Planning, Housing, and Economic Development, and incorporated herein by this reference, and received at duly notice public hearing related thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, E, E IT RESOLVED Y THE PLANNING COMMISSION MISSION OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD UTY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are hereby in herein by this reference as if fully set forth in their entirety. Section 2. That the Precise Plan as revised, which shawl include and incorporate therein by reference the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist, on file and made available at the Department of Planning, Housing, and Economic Development, and in herein b y this reference, is found to be in conformance with the goals and objectives of Article 52 of the Zoning Code of the City of Redwood City. Redwood City (the "City ") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources es Code Section 21000 et seq.) "CE A" to determine whether minor modifications to the Downtown Medical Campus Precise Plan (the "Kaiser Precise Plan" ) for the "Project" require further environmental review. Section 3. After consideration of the EIR, First Addendum to the EI , and the Second Addendum and Initial Study, on file and made available at the Department of Planning, Housing, and Economic Development, and incorporated herein by this reference, the Planning Commission finds, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that minor modifications to the Kaiser Precise Plan proposed by the Project do not raise important new issues about the environmental impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the Final Kaiser Perr anente Redwood City Medical Center Master Plan Environmental impact Deport (the "Kaiser Master Plan EIR " ). Furthermore, the June 16, 201 Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants "Fehr Peers" Technical Memorandum, orandum, attached hereto are E hibit B, concludes that the minor modifications do not create new c irculation impacts is and the transportation impa identified in the Kaiser Ma Plan EIR would be greater than the imparts resulting from implementation of the Project. Therefore, no further environmental review is required pursuant to CEoA. Pub. Ides. Code § 211 660; Cal. Code of F eg . Tit. 1 � §§ 15162, 15163. Atty /Reno /eo. 06231