My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-01-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-01-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2012 1:23:44 PM
Creation date
1/5/2012 4:46:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/9/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1. B. - Page 213 <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and Menlbers of City Council <br /> of the City of Pedwood City <br /> Pedwood City, California <br /> Page 2 <br /> Comnliance and Other Matters <br /> As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Cit�s fulancial statenlents are free of nlaterial <br /> nusstatenlent, we perfornled tests of its conlpliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, <br /> and grant agreenlents, nonconlpliance with wllich could 11ave a direct and nlaterial effect on the <br /> deternunation of fulancial statenlent anlounts. However, providing an opinion on conlpliance with those <br /> provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not e�ress such an opinion. The <br /> results of our tests disclosed one instance of nonconlpliance or other nlatters that is required to be reported <br /> under Goz�ernnient Auditing St��nc�ards and which is described u1 fl1e acconlpanyulg schedule of findulgs and <br /> questioned costs as itenl FS 2011-01. <br /> City's response to the findings identified uz our audit is descriUed in the acconlpanying schedule of findings <br /> and questioned costs. We did not audit City's response and, accordingly, we express no opulion on it. <br /> This report is intended solely for the infornlation and use of nlanagenlent, the City Council, others within <br /> the entity, and federal awarding agencies and pass-througll entities and is not intended to be and should <br /> not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. <br /> � � � ���� �� � <br /> � <br /> Caporicci & Larson, Inc. <br /> A Subsidiary of Marcum LLP, <br /> San Francisco, California <br /> Decenlber 7, 2011 <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.