My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2012 6:18:38 PM
Creation date
1/19/2012 6:06:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
6/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
approach to Runway .12. To clear the DHL building by 150 feet, an aircraft <br />would have to be at .an altitude of about 3 1 6 feet MSL as .it passed by the Project <br />site. To clear the Provident building by .150 feet, the aircraft would have to be at <br />an altitude of .3 0.8 feet MSL as it passed by the Project site. In order to achieve a <br />150400t clearance over the Paragon building, which is in direct alignment with the <br />EA building on the short base to f nal approach to .Runway 12, an aircraft would <br />have to pass over the IO -story building at an altitude of about 325 feet iSL. <br />(d) Flight track and altitude data derived from the San Francisco International <br />Airport PAS SUR system stem do not support the contention that aircraft operate at <br />altitudes as lour as .150 to 200 feet MSL in the vicinity of the 1 O -story building <br />when making a .short base to final approach to .Runway 12 under SVFR <br />conditions. No operations conducted in the vicinity of the Project site were at <br />altitudes of less than 300 .feet during the periods. surveyed., which included severe <br />winter conditions. <br />3 e 10.9 Potential Effect The location and height of the Project buildings could <br />potentially lit the number of aircraft that air traffic controllers would be willing <br />to handle under SVFR conditions within Qlass.D airspace, particularly at altitudes <br />of 20.0 feet or less. <br />Findings; The City hereby makes finding (1). <br />Facts in Support of Findings; <br />(a) The FAA Air Traffic Manager at San Carlos Airport has expressed this <br />concern. He has not, however, stated that the Project would represent a "hazard" <br />or "risk," but only that the job of the air traffic controllers could be made more <br />difficult. In fact, he stated at a public meeting on May 23, 1 996, that he had not <br />reached the conclusion that the buil ding represents a "hazard" to navigation, and <br />fuxtJher any statement to that effect attributed to him in the press is a nfisquote. <br />(b) - To determine the extent to which this issue could create problems, it is <br />useful to assess the likelihood and frequency of the conditions described. The <br />conditions that would result in aircraft- maneuvering .at .altitudes of 200 feet or less <br />within the vicinity of the .Project are .M.' the extrerne: a cloud ceiling of around 300 <br />feet with one mile visibility. These conditions are not a regular or frequent <br />occurrence. If they do occur, however, the Air Traffic Manager has questioned <br />whether staff would be willing to provide visual separation for more than two or <br />three SVF . aircraft in the Class D .airspace if they also had to be concerned about <br />the altitude of such aircraft in the vicinity of the ten -story building, However, it <br />would be even more rare to Have more than three aircraft operating under SVFR <br />FNDNGP I - DOC <br />5/30/9610:51 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.