AgdaPkt 2012-01-23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.3.A. - Page 2 AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 42 REGARDING USE PERMITS 1. Provides that Project approvals must be processed, heard and acted upon in conjunction with environmental review of the Project. For example, a use permit that requires the approval of an environmental document would be approved by the Planning Commission instead of the Zoning Administrator. 2. Requires noticed public hearing on applications for use permits, for modification or revocation of use permits. 3. Details the process for revocation and modification of use permits. 4. Appeals on use permits determined by the Zoning Administrator would be heard by the Planning Commission whose decision is final. 5. Appeals on use permits and the environmental documents determined by the Planning Commission would be heard by the City Council. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 48 REGARDING APPEALS 1. Provides that all appeals must be filed within fifteen days of the date of notice of the decision being appealed. 2. An appellant must submit all documents and materials supporting the appeal at the time the appeal is filed. 3. Appeals from decisions of the Zoning Administrator, Planning Manager or Community Development Director will be heard by the Planning Commission whose decision is final. 4. Appeals from decisions of the Planning Commission will be heard by the City Council. 5. Allows two councilmembers to request review of any matter for which there would normally not be any appeal to Council. Such a request would be heard de novo (as new) on appeal. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 49 REGARDING NOTICE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Clarifies that the required notice to be mailed or published in accordance with State law. AMENDMENTS TO MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO APPEALS 1. Amends various sections of the Zoning Ordinance relating to appeals to make them consistent with Article 48 by providing that appeals from decisions of the Page 2 of 3